Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Refs screwed us


gorillamilitia13
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

There's a difference between did the SCREW US or did they mess up a call. Yes, they messed up a call, maybe two.

But there are actually people on this board that truly think the refs and league are out to get us and screw us on purpose lol.

It’s sad because those people can also vote… scary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

You trust that defense? No excuses the game plan and coaching were absolutely horrid Elflein can't snap the dang ball, it's almost like Rhules clown show of a oline competition denied them continuity.

That's what we are built on right?? Most of our stars are supposed to be on defense right?? Thats where all the top picks are... After the fumble snap I would have played it the same way.. Run the clock down as much as you can.. Make them drive the field against the defense..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Not a bad idea if you don’t telegraph what you are doing by having Baker under center. While Elflein did have one bad snap when Baker was in shotgun, most of his snaps were much better when Baker was in shotgun rather than under center.

Not to mention, the ball has to be snapped regardless of if it’s a run or pass. Elflein still had to snap the ball two more times when they ran McCaffrey right up Elflein’s backside.

If they were running a RPO.. Taking a snap under Center is the better fake.. right??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

If they were running a RPO.. Taking a snap under Center is the better fake.. right??

Doesn’t have to be RPO, a delayed draw could have been highly effective in that scenario. Hell, you can even run a jet sweep in that situation with D.J.

That whole instance was horribly managed.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

That's what we are built on right?? Most of our stars are supposed to be on defense right?? Thats where all the top picks are... After the fumble snap I would have played it the same way.. Run the clock down as much as you can.. Make them drive the field against the defense..

The talent is there IMO the hairbrained college scheme is not.... But I digress I really just don't care until the fhule is gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MillionDollarCam said:

Doesn’t have to be RPO, a delayed draw could have been highly effective in that scenario. Hell, you can even run a jet sweep in that situation with D.J.

That all instance was horribly managed.

Could have been but if they faked the run up the middle and hit the slant.. That was open because the defense was setting up for the run up the middle..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Could have been but if they faked the run up the middle and hit the slant.. That was open because the defense was setting up for the run up the middle..

Well yeah, but that would require the staff to put the ball in the air which they obviously didn’t want to do. Just really hated the play calls on that last series. Just seemed way too conservative, the type of conservative we used to blast Rivera for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Well yeah, but that would require the staff to put the ball in the air which they obviously didn’t want to do. Just really hated the play calls on that last series. Just seemed way too conservative, the type of conservative we used to blast Rivera for.

Again we don't know after the fumble snap.. That fumble snap probably messed up all plans of going for the throat..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Again we don't know after the fumble snap.. That fumble snap probably messed up all plans of going for the throat..

Could have been, but then we as fans can ask why Bozeman is sitting on the bench.. which is another coaching blunder. And there are still relatively safe play calls like sweeps and screens that aren’t as easily defendable as to inside draws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...