Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cmac Had Only 14 Touches!!!


Catsfan69
 Share

Recommended Posts

That's the game right there. You have the best weapon in the Game you have to use him.

He needs 30 touches a game and if he got them we win. 

Hell he really only had 13 when you don't count the fumble recovery.

 

Sometimes you just have to ride your thoroughbred. 

 

Our OC doesn't seem any smarter this year than last.

Edited by Catsfan69
  • Pie 2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WarHeel said:

I liked his moderately conservative use. I don’t like how the rest of the offense went AWOL with the exception of a couple deep passes to Thomas and Robbie.

 

Get more folks involved on the offense, improve the D-line, and stop fumbling the damn ball and we win this game.

You gotta ride your studs in pro sports.

He's our only actual Weapon. 

DJ is good but not great.

Cmac is the best in the world at what he does.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

You gotta ride your studs in pro sports.

He's our only actual Weapon. 

DJ is good but not great.

Cmac is the best in the world at what he does.

Yeah, let’s run him into the ground like we have for 5 years straight. That’s worked out well the last two years for our record and his health.

  • Pie 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WarHeel said:

Yeah, let’s run him into the ground like we have for 5 years straight. That’s worked out well the last two years for our record and his health.

His health wasn't that bad.

 

If we had been in contention he would have played. 

You know how you get out of contention in a hurry? You lose to The Browns in a winnable game. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I thought we used him too much early on last year, but this was the worst game plan I’ve ever seen with a healthy CMC.  Volume aside, the offensive play calling didn’t do much to get him the ball in space.

Yeah his first few touches were runs up the middle? I thought McAdoo had 5 waffle house menus of play calls. Looked worse than preseason play calls in the first half

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, hepcat said:

If he got 30 touches he’d get injured by week 3 like he always does 

Lol that's simply not true.

Soft tissue stuff is random.

We need him to win the game. What good is saving him if doing so costs you the game?

 

That sounds like my ex wife every time she spent money. I saved 49%.

I had to explain that if you spend 100% of our money at 49% off we still have zero money.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweetness averaged 24 touches.

Emmit 22 but there was some injury years but at his peak 28 touches per game.

Faulk had low overall use amongst the greats at about 20 per overall but had years averging 29 touches per game.

 

So most hall of fame backs at their peak were being ridden 27,28,30 times a game.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Sweetness averaged 24 touches.

Emmit 22 but there was some injury years but at his peak 28 touches per game.

Faulk had low overall use amongst the greats at about 20 per overall but had years averging 29 touches per game.

 

So most hall of fame backs at their peak were being ridden 27,28,30 times a game.

 

I'm fine with 18-25 a game for CMC.... but dang use the weapon early 3 of of those touches were dumb up the gut into a 10 man box 58 minutes into the game and anther one we don't even know if he was going to get the ball on the play because of the bad snap.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah I'm still not sure about Canales' play calling but I'll give him another season. Still can't quite figure out why you think Young won't work out. His numbers with Theilen are as good as any QB Theien's ever had - including the three games he has started with Rogers this year. Cokers' numbers are as good as Theilens and he is an UDFA and TMac is in the run for ORTY with Young as his QB. Young's throwing more accurately now (from 21.5% in 23 to 16.5% this year) and he has shown he can make the throws in clutch moments. If you take into account he was saddled with XL, Chark, Mingo and Johnson for receivers at one point, had a coaching staff his first year that didn't want him and a current coach who is suspect at play calling, I'm not sure he has been as bad as people here say. I know he has had terrible moments/games but most qb's still on their rookie contract will.  Anyway, had to give my weekly BY plug. Guess I thought this was the perfect time lol.
    • He missed a lot of time. Was slow getting back up to speed. And we have an offense that is not exactly WR friendly so his targets were low.  How many targets does anyone get when you have 120 yards passing, 54 yards passing, 160 yards, most of the time? It probably took the time it needed to take.
    • The 5th year option jus gives them a little more time to make their decision and figure out the position going forward.  The idea that it means hes def gonna get a extension is asinine.
×
×
  • Create New...