Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What did Baker change at halftime?

RumHam

By RumHam,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Pantha-kun said:

man fug that. They should have trippled garrett and made literally anyone else try to get it done. leaving a rookie one on one with garrett for any amount of time is pure idiocy on either Rhules, Macadoo, or offensive line coaches part, or all 3 of the bozos...

Seriously, did Rhule think a game one rookie was going to be perfect against Garrett.  It is those type of decisions that are going to cost us game after game.  It's already happened once and it is only game 1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pantha-kun Mentor

Pantha-kun

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Baker Mayfield in a nutshell. ONE good quarter with a bunch of crap before that.

Not impressed by one good quarter of football. If that was Cam that fact would've been pointed out but instead people are on the dudes nuts completely, underservedly.

this is an underrated by true point here. That poo in first half by Baker was inexcusable even taking the OLINE, play calling, defense,  and coaching into account

he played like it was his first time playing QB in his entire life somehow . It looked like it was too big for him. No cap. 

Edited by Pantha-kun
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wolfman Apprentice

Wolfman

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Faker. Fhules Gold. Until he does better in the first three quarters, he ain't nothing like what they're advertising.

Cam didn't get this much slurping and he actually deserved some.

Like who was advertising? You got Mayfield for almost nothing. He's a hell of a lot better than what you had. He is not a hall of fame q.b. His problems are in his head, not in his ability. The guy has a fragile ego, and that's why he's inconsistent. He struggles as soon as he has a few incompletions. But...once he gets his confidence, he's hard to beat. The bottom line is he led the Panthers on a come back and put them in a position to win. Brisset didn't beat you yesterday.....the defense and the penalties on that last drive by the Browns beat you. Yeah...you can say "if he wouldn't have played like crap in the first half we would have won". I would say if your defense would have played better, you would have won. Also...who thought their rookie kicker would make a 58 yard f.g. with the game on the line? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

Why did it take them an entire half to make that move? Don't they have access to game film on Garrett?

They tried with Tremble and Ian... they failed continuously. I think putting Ricci in there proved to be effective. Ricci is just quicker on his feet than the other two. I went back and watched the game through NFL+... we started chipping and providing support to the left side at the very begining of the 2nd half. 

 

Just sounds like a halftime adjustment.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, Pantha-kun said:

this is an underrated by true point here. That poo in first half by Baker was inexcusable even taking the OLINE, play calling, defense,  and coaching into account

he played like it was his first time playing QB in his entire life somehow . It looked like it was too big for him. No cap. 

He's not a technician, not a student of the game, just a guy getting by not driven to be the best him he could be because moxy and trash talk worked just good enough to Fake it.

Four years in. He is who he is, just like Sam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Wolfman said:

Like who was advertising? You got Mayfield for almost nothing. He's a hell of a lot better than what you had. He is not a hall of fame q.b. His problems are in his head, not in his ability. The guy has a fragile ego, and that's why he's inconsistent. He struggles as soon as he has a few incompletions. But...once he gets his confidence, he's hard to beat. The bottom line is he led the Panthers on a come back and put them in a position to win. Brisset didn't beat you yesterday.....the defense and the penalties on that last drive by the Browns beat you. Yeah...you can say "if he wouldn't have played like crap in the first half we would have won". I would say if your defense would have played better, you would have won. Also...who thought their rookie kicker would make a 58 yard f.g. with the game on the line? 

The huddle said he was the second coming of Drew Brees and Jake Delhomme. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Where would the Panthers be if they sat Bryce Young last season?

      By CRA · Posted

      I mean, poster also said Young or Mahomes, it would have made no difference.  If there was way to actually test that hypothetical, I would sell every belonging I have and wager that Mahomes would indeed yield different results.  Mahomes automatically changes the D coverages.  He automatically changes the threats.  He attacks and threatens a field different vastly different.   We have seen good QBs and great QBs play behind horrific OLs in a single season....and they don't default into being the worst team in the NFL.  Frank Reich was old, stubborn and not creative enough to deal with an anomaly QB like Bryce.  The best QB in the NFL wouldn't be handicapping Frank, they would be enhancing Frank.  Starting week 1, Frank didn't even trust Bryce with basics....Frank gave him I what I feel comfortable with you being able to do offense.  Which took throws and plays off the table because Bryce couldn't do early on what a bad vet in Dalton could.  Mahomes would not yield the same results. 
    • strato
      Where would the Panthers be if they sat Bryce Young last season?

      By strato · Posted

      All I have to say to this really, is it sounds nice and downgrades Stroud to make Young look better is more like what this take does. Look at the WR numbers the year before and then the year with Stroud. He made them better, not the other way around. That’s my opinion. I appreciate you designating that it was yours. Many state these things as facts.
    • CRA
      Front office/scouting staff changes

      By CRA · Posted

      but what if.....and here me out....the pro Bryce Young stuff was coming from people under Fitterer.  You know, the people who are employed to feed him that input.  And they happen to all still be employed here.  when Rhule was fired I desperately wanted Fitterer fired.  It set things up for Fitterer to be the sacrificial lamb the next time things went poorly....every time we move on from a disaster, we are retaining a heavy % of the folks who helped bring the disaster we are "moving on from".  Everyone argued Fitterer probably could be great and it was all Rhule.  We are just repeating the same stuff to a degree IMO.   Panthers needed a clean slate post Rhule era.  Needed another post Frank era.  Things were just too bad or too dysfunctional IMO to be salvaging so much.   We keep failing to do that. 
×
×
  • Create New...