Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is there any reason to keep Robbie Anderson after this year?


Snake
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Snake said:

He's the second highest paid player on this team and return on investment isn't coming up in the green. With a potential out coming in 23 we could trade or cut him and save a good bit in a rebuild year. Discuss. 

We lose on Sunday.  Both he and cmac better be traded by Tuesday.   Get a first for cmac and a 4rth maybe 3rd for sideshow bob

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

We lose on Sunday.  Both he and cmac better be traded by Tuesday.   Get a first for cmac and a 4rth maybe 3rd for sideshow bob

CMC would cost 19.5M in EXTRA cap space, immediately, if he’s traded now. RA about 10M. And they already restructured every vet on team but Erving. 
 

   That “mythical” salary cap does have consequences when you borrow from the future to build 5 win teams. 

Edited by Toomers
  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

CMC would cost 19.5M in EXTRA cap space, immediately, if he’s traded now. RA about 10M. And they already restructured every vet on team but Erving. 
 

   That “mythical” salary does have consequences when you borrow from the future to build 5 win teams. 

Damn it.   Makes me hate fitt and Hurley even more.   No good reason to extend either of the two. 
 

so we have to wait until the off season to trade cmac?

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...