Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Time to see darnold next week?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

We could trade for Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers tomorrow and they would look the worst they ever have in their career for the rest of the season.  Baker is playing below expectations and not good at all, to be frank.  He's missing the open throws and he looks scared.  But, shitty QB play is just a symptom of a Rhule offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

We could trade for Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers tomorrow and they would look the worst they ever have in their career for the rest of the season.  Baker is playing below expectations and not good at all, to be frank.  He's missing the open throws and he looks scared.  But, shitty QB play is just a symptom of a Rhule offense.

 

Oh come on man. Both of those guys would make this team competitive from the start. This team does have talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

Oh come on man. Both of those guys would make this team competitive from the start. This team does have talent.

I dont dispute we have talent.  But I maintain the offense is not conducive to good QB play.  The only way those guys would make us look any better is if they were given full autonomy of the offense, much like what TB did with Brady when he came in...  Look at the plays and play designs today.  Again, that could've been Brady or Rodgers on those bootlegs and screens, and those plays would still net nothing because the receivers aren't open.  It isn't the talent.  It's the coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I dont dispute we have talent.  But I maintain the offense is not conducive to good QB play.  The only way those guys would make us look any better is if they were given full autonomy of the offense, much like what TB did with Brady when he came in...  Look at the plays and play designs today.  Again, that could've been Brady or Rodgers on those bootlegs and screens, and those plays would still net nothing because the receivers aren't open.  It isn't the talent.  It's the coaching.

 

Yeah, I'm sorry, but I'm not going that far down the rabbit hole. You are blaming everyone. Not one player is playing well. Coaches sux, Owner sux.

 

I see a team that just needs a competent QB. Our D looks legit. Our run game can be effective. Our WRs ARE getting open, but the QB can't hit them.

 

Like I said. A COMPETENT QB makes us a very competitive team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gerry Green said:

 

Yeah, I'm sorry, but I'm not going that far down the rabbit hole. You are blaming everyone. Not one player is playing well. Coaches sux, Owner sux.

 

I see a team that just needs a competent QB. Our D looks legit. Our run game can be effective. Our WRs ARE getting open, but the QB can't hit them.

 

Like I said. A COMPETENT QB makes us a very competitive team.

Idk what game you were watching, but those receivers were not open.  I counted maybe 3 or 4 throws where they were clearly open and Baker missed them.

Baker is playing like poo, but again, this offense has looked the same under 4 different QBs and 3 different OCs.  It's not the players.  Don't get me wrong, if a better option than Baker became available, we should be all over it...  but, they're still not going to look good either because the scheme is ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

Yes, ride Darnold to 1-16 and the #1 pick 

I'm down for that.

And this time draft a Top QB instead of a Corner or something.   😐

 

If we're gonna fail, then let's fail SPECTACULARLY.

 

But I see Baker going back out there next week 'cause they won regardless.

Edited by glenwo2
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Idk what game you were watching, but those receivers were not open.  I counted maybe 3 or 4 throws where they were clearly open and Baker missed them.

Baker is playing like poo, but again, this offense has looked the same under 4 different QBs and 3 different OCs.  It's not the players.  Don't get me wrong, if a better option than Baker became available, we should be all over it...  but, they're still not going to look good either because the scheme is ass.

 

Watching on tv is not the best way to evaluate how wide open WR are. Also, QBs need to be able to make throws into small windows. WR should not have to have 3 yards of separation to be considered open?

 

Also, let us not get sidetracked from the fact Baker was not so good today. 

Edited by Gerry Green
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Tyreek is a bad person to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
    • I think some depth at guard would be nice.  
    • I may no longer have the photo of Sir Purr saved somewhere anymore, as that was taken, uniquely, at an actual game, and sometimes files go missing between computers and phones etc.  That said, I am sure I can find something similar. Maybe even better. Not too worried. I still have regular access to the account email. Change is good.
×
×
  • Create New...