Time to see darnold next week?

[Proudiddy]

We could trade for Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers tomorrow and they would look the worst they ever have in their career for the rest of the season.  Baker is playing below expectations and not good at all, to be frank.  He's missing the open throws and he looks scared.  But, shitty QB play is just a symptom of a Rhule offense.

[Fox007]

Like I said before...Darnold could put the ball in the end zone but he could also throw it to the other team as much. Darnold could run better and throw better and turn the ball over better.

shrug 

[mav1234]

I'm confident the interceptions will come for Baker (career wise he's hot much better than Darnold, lol), but Darnold has no future here and there's no reason to play him now. 

[Floppin]

From a tools perspective, Darnold is the superior QB. He's just dumb as rocks and makes terrible decisions with the ball.

[Gerry Green]

7 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

We could trade for Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers tomorrow and they would look the worst they ever have in their career for the rest of the season.  Baker is playing below expectations and not good at all, to be frank.  He's missing the open throws and he looks scared.  But, shitty QB play is just a symptom of a Rhule offense.

 

Oh come on man. Both of those guys would make this team competitive from the start. This team does have talent.

[SurvivalSloth]

I just honestly think Baker's too short. That and he's overthrowing receivers worse than Cam ever did...and Cam did it a lot.

[Proudiddy]

4 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

Oh come on man. Both of those guys would make this team competitive from the start. This team does have talent.

I dont dispute we have talent.  But I maintain the offense is not conducive to good QB play.  The only way those guys would make us look any better is if they were given full autonomy of the offense, much like what TB did with Brady when he came in...  Look at the plays and play designs today.  Again, that could've been Brady or Rodgers on those bootlegs and screens, and those plays would still net nothing because the receivers aren't open.  It isn't the talent.  It's the coaching.

[Gerry Green]

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I dont dispute we have talent.  But I maintain the offense is not conducive to good QB play.  The only way those guys would make us look any better is if they were given full autonomy of the offense, much like what TB did with Brady when he came in...  Look at the plays and play designs today.  Again, that could've been Brady or Rodgers on those bootlegs and screens, and those plays would still net nothing because the receivers aren't open.  It isn't the talent.  It's the coaching.

 

Yeah, I'm sorry, but I'm not going that far down the rabbit hole. You are blaming everyone. Not one player is playing well. Coaches sux, Owner sux.

 

I see a team that just needs a competent QB. Our D looks legit. Our run game can be effective. Our WRs ARE getting open, but the QB can't hit them.

 

Like I said. A COMPETENT QB makes us a very competitive team.

[Proudiddy]

Just now, Gerry Green said:

 

Yeah, I'm sorry, but I'm not going that far down the rabbit hole. You are blaming everyone. Not one player is playing well. Coaches sux, Owner sux.

 

I see a team that just needs a competent QB. Our D looks legit. Our run game can be effective. Our WRs ARE getting open, but the QB can't hit them.

 

Like I said. A COMPETENT QB makes us a very competitive team.

Idk what game you were watching, but those receivers were not open.  I counted maybe 3 or 4 throws where they were clearly open and Baker missed them.

Baker is playing like poo, but again, this offense has looked the same under 4 different QBs and 3 different OCs.  It's not the players.  Don't get me wrong, if a better option than Baker became available, we should be all over it...  but, they're still not going to look good either because the scheme is ass.

[Shocker]

Darnold is probably better than the Baker we have seen

[Move the Panthers to Raleigh]

Yes, ride Darnold to 1-16 and the #1 pick 

[glenwo2]

3 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

Yes, ride Darnold to 1-16 and the #1 pick 

I'm down for that.

And this time draft a Top QB instead of a Corner or something.  

 

If we're gonna fail, then let's fail SPECTACULARLY.

 

But I see Baker going back out there next week 'cause they won regardless.

Edited September 25, 2022 by glenwo2

[Gerry Green]

9 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Idk what game you were watching, but those receivers were not open.  I counted maybe 3 or 4 throws where they were clearly open and Baker missed them.

Baker is playing like poo, but again, this offense has looked the same under 4 different QBs and 3 different OCs.  It's not the players.  Don't get me wrong, if a better option than Baker became available, we should be all over it...  but, they're still not going to look good either because the scheme is ass.

 

Watching on tv is not the best way to evaluate how wide open WR are. Also, QBs need to be able to make throws into small windows. WR should not have to have 3 yards of separation to be considered open?

 

Also, let us not get sidetracked from the fact Baker was not so good today. 

Edited September 25, 2022 by Gerry Green

[davos]

I think we need to try another QB and OC.