Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Team Played For Their Coach Today


Daddy_Uncle
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, CRA said:

Reality is the O played like utter dog poo

the D played against a hurt QB.  One who was clearly hurt and made the Saints O almost inoperable for most of the game. 

I mean you can’t really feel good about the Panthers at all through 3 games.  It’s the worst the Panthers have looked to kick off any season of the Rhule era 

Bad thing is that jameis with his broken ribs looked significantly better than a healthy baker 

  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

See the problem on this board is all in this post. We assume that our staff doesn’t do these things because we base all of these things on the final outcomes. We don’t see what happens during the prep week. We don’t see what happens during halftime. We don’t see anything that goes on in the meeting rooms or between players. We view poor performance and outcomes on coaching prep, adjustments, etc. Sometimes it’s as easy as making one more play. Example: If Horn picks Winston or Shaq picks Winston we potentially prevent a score or score ourselves. Last week: if burns keeps contain and gets a sack the giants don’t score a TD drive, we win the game. Coaches coach. Players play. It’s that simple. Winston has been in NO for 2.5 years. Baker has been here 3 months, and split starter reps with Darnold during camp. We’ll figure it out. All these people here using Cincinnati as an example before have shut the fug up. They are exactly where we are. Chill and be a fan, or just pick the yearly winner.  

We don't have to see all that.

When a team looks unprepared, or they get penalized too much, or players make too many mental mistakes, or when other teams make adjustments that change the course of a game, or any number of other things, there are coaching issues.

The biggest sign of poor coaching though?

Consistent losing across multiple seasons.

We've been doing that...and still are.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Bad thing is that jameis with his broken ribs looked significantly better than a healthy baker 

 

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Ummm? What?

Baker certainly hasn't been great but count him to champion that after pushing the Baker leads the NFL in INTs the last *X* years.... Meanwhile Jameis hands them out like candy and has the highest interceptions to starts ratio.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

 

Baker certainly hasn't been great but count him to champion that after pushing the Baker leads the NFL in INTs the last *X* years.... Meanwhile Jameis hands them out like candy and has the highest interceptions to starts ratio.

That's cool. I'm talking about today. Jameis had an int off a tipped pass and one in garbage time. Baker looked like ass literally the entire day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

See the problem on this board is all in this post. We assume that our staff doesn’t do these things because we base all of these things on the final outcomes. We don’t see what happens during the prep week. We don’t see what happens during halftime. We don’t see anything that goes on in the meeting rooms or between players. We view poor performance and outcomes on coaching prep, adjustments, etc. Sometimes it’s as easy as making one more play. Example: If Horn picks Winston or Shaq picks Winston we potentially prevent a score or score ourselves. Last week: if burns keeps contain and gets a sack the giants don’t score a TD drive, we win the game. Coaches coach. Players play. It’s that simple. Winston has been in NO for 2.5 years. Baker has been here 3 months, and split starter reps with Darnold during camp. We’ll figure it out. All these people here using Cincinnati as an example before have shut the fug up. They are exactly where we are. Chill and be a fan, or just pick the yearly winner.  

Results are the only thing that matters. If it was just one or two games where things didn't work out quite right, it wouldn't be so bad. The problem with this team is that they are having issues every week. Every week it's a new excuse. There's excuses for things not going right, but eventually a good coach would help us win in spite of the things that go wrong...they'd make adjustments. 

And the argument for the lack of time with Baker under center with the starters.....that's on Rhule as well. He knew that time was short prior to the season, yet he decided to keep that ruse "competition" going. It was detrimental to the teams ability to compete early on....and that's if Baker sucking isn't a result of him just being a bad QB. 

Going back to the discussion of good coaches, though, good coaches make things go right, they redirect rhings, when things start trending wrong. 

This poo has been going on with Rhule love Ng enough to know he can't figure out how to make things right. 

Captains can't control the weather, but they make sure that their ship handles the storm and that their ship hands all do their job successfully. Rhule is a bad captain.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Not the disagreement the insult but that's completely fair am I allowed to use that one on the certainly obvious posters I disagree with? 😃

Just me. My job isn't to make sure I don't get insulted. If I do it right that's going to happen. My job is to make sure that when people do disagree they don't get too pissy with each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From most accounts I’ve heard and seen online or from media outlets - the players like Ruhle. I’ve said it 100x he seems like he is a straight dude and seems like a guy you could have a garage beer with I just don’t think he is a good NFL coach with X&Os and questionable football IQ. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here’s a summary of the JJ and Luke podcast transcript. Opening / Bryce Young Fifth-Year Option     •    JJ: Breaking news — Panthers picked up Bryce Young’s fifth-year option at $25.9M, guaranteed, coming in 2027. Combined with his 2025 salary of ~$6M, that’s $31M over two years — called it a “no-brainer.”     •    Luke: Enthusiastic about the move. Highlighted Bryce’s improving TD/INT ratios (11/10 → 15/9 → 23/11) and the value of entering year three with Dave Canales. Noted $25M is a bargain relative to the $60M top of market. Luke’s Personal Update — Charlotte Christian Football     •    Luke: Working with Charlotte Christian school football program, which hired a new head coach. Coaches include Greg Olsen, Luke, and Greg’s dad Chris Olsen (a New Jersey State coaching Hall of Famer).     •    JJ: Jokingly quipped that Charlotte Christian’s coaching staff is “the world’s greatest” — a Fox analyst, a Hall of Famer, and the best Panthers RB ever — all coaching middle school football.     •    Luke: Praised Chris Olsen’s deep football knowledge spanning decades and his ability to connect with kids. Round 1, Pick 19 — Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia     •    JJ: Panthers were on the clock and submitted their pick almost immediately — a sign of confidence and preparation. Freeling is 6’7”, 320 lbs, played in the SEC in a pro-style system.     •    Luke: Loved the pick. Emphasized you can never have too many quality offensive linemen. Noted Freeling’s size, athleticism, and arm length as key traits. Said the pick also reflects team’s philosophy of drafting great people, not just great players.     •    JJ: Noted reporter Darren Gantt compared Freeling favorably to Jordan Gross — bigger, heavier, and faster — as a potential franchise left tackle.     •    Luke: Pointed out that young players like Freeling still have physical development ahead of them, comparing the trajectory to Christian McCaffrey’s growth from age 20 onward. Round 2, Pick 49 — Lee Hunter, DT, Texas Tech     •    JJ: Panthers traded up from 51 to 49 (pick swap with Minnesota) to grab Hunter. Played audio from Panthers area scout Kaden McLuhan, who scouted Hunter.     •    Scout Kaden McLuhan (audio): Said Hunter’s size is immediately striking, and that everyone around him spoke glowingly about his character, energy, and love for the game.     •    Luke: Praised Hunter as a massive (6’3”, 320 lbs, ~34” arms) two-gap nose tackle who fits perfectly in the Evero defense. Compared his prospect profile to Akiem Hicks. Said having Derek Brown, Bobby Brown, Derrick Brown, Terson Wharton, and now Hunter creates varied body types that stress offensive linemen.     •    JJ: Noted Hunter ranked third among all prospects in run-stuff rate and sixth in interior pass-rush win rate — addressing a perception that he couldn’t rush the passer. Rounds 3–7 Highlights     •    Luke: Highlighted WR Brazle (3rd round, 6’4”, 437 speed, 1,000+ yards at Tennessee) as the vertical threat the offense needed. Also praised OL Sam Heck (5th round) as a technically sound player whose “short arms” caused him to fall but who has proven himself.     •    Luke: Mentioned CB Will Lee (6’1”, 33” arms) fits the Panthers’ DB prototype — big, long corners.     •    Luke: Praised S/LB hybrid Zaki Wheatley (5th round, 6’3”) as a big nickel similar to Trayvon Merek.     •    Luke: Excited about the linebacker competition between Devin Lloyd, Trevvin Wallace, and Claudin Cherless.     •    JJ: Noted Panthers had the #1 “steal/overreach” rating in the entire draft — drafting players lower than consensus big boards projected. Around the League     •    Luke: Admitted being “a little jealous” that the Miami Dolphins drafted LB Jacob Rodriguez (Luke’s favorite LB in the draft). Has personal connections to Miami’s coaching staff (Jeff Hafley, DC Shawn Dugen — a childhood teammate).     •    Luke: Also noted Miami’s selection of OT/G Kaden Proctor out of Alabama, who will likely move to guard. League Trends — Bigger Tight Ends / 12 & 13 Personnel     •    JJ: Observed the NFL saw its highest run rate in ~11 years (~52%) and a notable pivot toward big blocking tight ends in this draft.     •    Luke: Explained the cyclical nature of NFL offense/defense evolution — as defenses get smaller to match spread offenses, teams counter with bigger personnel (12/13 formations), which then forces defenses to get bigger at the nickel/“big nickel” spot. Called it an ongoing arms race.
    • Dan Vladar is their best player and that is going to be the difference in the series 
    • Nothing about the Flyers scare me. They are a mid team that just barely made the playoffs. 
×
×
  • Create New...