Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Props to Phil Snow


ncsfinest21
 Share

Recommended Posts

Phil Snow had the defense ready today. Granted they got some long passes and Olave killed us but the adjustments to blitz and use creative designed stunts to confuse Winston and put pressure on him to get rid of the ball allowed us to seal the W. We need more of that, especially on 3rd and long. Offense is still garbage and needs to pick it up but kudos to shenault for his 103 yards and TD on 1 drive. Made Bakers stats look real deceptive.

 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a few guys step up and I loved the energy and effort for the most part...  but we gave up 353 pass yards and I believe it was 84 rush yards.  The difference was the turnovers and that the Saints are a bad team.  And the turnovers were created by the players more than the scheme.

  • Pie 5
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

We had a few guys step up and I loved the energy and effort for the most part...  but we gave up 353 pass yards and I believe it was 84 rush yards.  The difference was the turnovers and that the Saints are a bad team.  And the turnovers were created by the players more than the scheme.

I would say the LUVU rip was but the other two was because Horn came on a blitz and tipped the ball and derrick brown picked it. That was because of the package and confusion and same with the last, blitz and Winston forced it and Horn Int. The long passes players just got burned, particularly Henderson and thats not Snows fault. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I appreciate the approach today. The tough part was we were running zero blitzes when we had a two touch down lead in the fourth quarter. I am more of the type who’d prefer to bring 3-5 and play coverage in that’s situation. I know other’s prefer to keep the heat coming. At the end of the day it’s about execution. I would have rather we went into coverage mode, but fug it we won.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

I appreciate the approach today. The tough part was we were running zero blitzes when we had a two touch down lead in the fourth quarter. I am more of the type who’d prefer to bring 3-5 and play coverage in that’s situation. I know other’s prefer to keep the heat coming. At the end of the day it’s about execution. I would have rather we went into coverage mode, but fug it we won.

I believe we did go into coverage mode and that's when he started finding rhythm in the offense. When we started pressuring him we started getting Ints. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ncsfinest21 said:

I believe we did go into coverage mode and that's when he started finding rhythm in the offense. When we started pressuring him we started getting Ints. 

The biggest pass plays today came off of the zero blitz’s. There was one play to Olave that went for 25ish yards that was just a cover 2 beater. That was due to the pass rush not getting home.

 

also, am I the only one that feels the tre smith catch was incomplete ??

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burns still dropping back in pass coverage.

Chinn still away from the LOS despite having an int and a defelction when he's up.

The inability to stop the one route Michael Thomas runs early on in drives. 

Lining the DBs 10 yards off the WRs on 2nd,3rd and short for easy conversions. 

The team still went prevent soft zone up 13 and almost let them back in the game. 

 

There is still PLENTY I'm not happy with about this defense but I will give props to Derrick Brown who played his ass off again. This unit is night and day when he plays like he did today. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Weren't Icky and Grier both Panthers fans too?
    • I didn’t like this draft at all. XL, our first pick had one good season out of five and doesn’t have burst off the line.  I wanted Ladd here because I think he’d have been a much better pairing for BY9s weak arm.  We need to be an excellent west coast style offense if Bryce is gonna shine.  A burner that takes 3 steps to get moving and doesn’t separate at the line is a bad choice IMO. I don’t even want to talk about drafting a RB after having Foreman make us feel better about trading CMC only to send him packing and give Sanders top FA money last year to fall on his face.  We always try to get cute and find value.  The fact that we were the first team to take a RB (one recovering from a serious injury no less) tells you we didn’t get the memo 31 other teams got.  RB has a huge role in protection responsibility, it’s a huge reason some great backs are situational…they suck in protection.  A rookie RB helping protect BY doesn’t warm my heart.  We should have taken the top C on the board here IMO. LB and yet another project TE that’ll probably just frustrate us all for how long he hangs around seemingly doing nothing.  Then a bunch of dice rolls that aren’t changing any fortune unless it’s a complete accident. TLDR This whole draft looks like JAGs to me at best.  I don’t like the XL or JB picks at all.  Always happy to be wrong when I have a negative take.
    • I'll tell you how you should benefit from using this in a moment. However, things are alright now. You might have to be really skilled to use their find effectively. I'm not the most ideal customer when it is put alongside that condition. Here are the pros. I put my foot in my mouth. I had high expectations. We'll face up to reality. My notion is based around my assumption that nobody has a partiality concerning doing that. There is a culture that has been built around some hindrance and also you should understand how some command will impact your life. Really honestly, if you actually reckon about it, how good is that stuff? Whenever somebody experiences the doohickey, it is best that they do not hesitate to talk to a professional.    OFFICIAL WEBSITE ----> https://www.onlymyhealth.com/sugar-defender-reviews-blood-sugar-supplement-complaints-1709036624   Go Down For More Info:-   https://www.onlymyhealth.com/puravive-reviews-side-effects-and-complaints-1709979035 https://www.onlymyhealth.com/fitspresso-reviews-coffee-loophole-recipe-dangerous-side-effects-and-complaints-1710235827   https://medium.com/@lancebrum/sugar-defender-buyer-beware-heres-the-real-story-must-read-cfbe26c6a174 https://hackmd.io/@lancebrum/SugarDefender https://www.eventogo.com/event/sugar-defender-supplement-what-you-should-be-aware-in-update-2024/ https://www.techdirectory.io/new-york/adtech/sugar-defender https://gamma.app/docs/Sugar-Defender-Buyer-Beware-Heres-The-Real-Story-Must-Read-7vy0ew8b8doq9hm https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/59f21551-e405-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://pgccouncilcsp.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/604e7f79-e405-ef11-a73d-001dd806eee4 https://thecontingent.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/5f1e49b0-e405-ef11-a73d-6045bd01c1cc https://twor.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/support-forum/1bf52a1d-e505-ef11-a73d-6045bd3fd1cb
×
×
  • Create New...