Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Previous Game is Under Review- Any Specific Requests?


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Adb6368 said:

Give me the confirmation we all hope- Derrick brown is not a bust and his good play is because of pure talent and not luck

I can already confirm that. He was a beast today. The bust train on brown is probably going to break down if he has one more week like Last week and today.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tight ends are also interesting so far. Is Ian Thomas doing anything that Tremble and Ricci couldn't do as well or better? He always seems to whiff on blocks/get handled in man when receiving/generally playing smaller than he is. He's the highest paid dude so coulda saved that $5M if he's not an obvious upgrade when on the field

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just did a rewatch on NFL+ condensed and created some some observations I'd love your breakdown to confirm or refute. The rewatch left me feeling: 

-worse about the run game and play calling specific to run; so many CMC runs up the gut fr too many short gains that seem like eventually will lead to an injury. 

-better about the QB + passing game (but not good about the QB and the passing game, just better than the shitshow it seemed live

-worse about the general offense flow like the first two games, the offense seems to kill drives just as they're getting going

-that it wasn't all dysfunction: the saints coverage had some timely plays that turned scoring drives into field goals

- in rewatching, i think two of Mayfield's passes (one to CMC one to DJ that looked high were tipped slightly driving them higher

-the line seems to be solid at time, but gives up untimely pressures

-I feel worse about predicatability in play calling general

-I feel generally good about the run defense (how it felt after Kamara's first big run)

-much more worried about the pass defense. Zone seemed soft, gave up several sets of big plays, leaving...

-Jameis looking much better in the second viewing, except...

- there were three dropped interceptions by the Panthers (but he's Jameis, so...)

- in general defense did a lot of bending, only really broke twice. Big plays by the D made up for the drives..

-Shenault just seemed to explode when he touched the ball. His two plays stood out again. 

I feel like I could be wrong about any of the above, but that's just how it looked on the second viewing. Felt (slightly) better about offensive execution, worse about playcalling and pass defense, and want to see Shenault enough that maybe it forces opposing defenses to alter schemes and free up CMC and DJ more. 

Another thing, and maybe this is a general question. Has Mayfield thrown a single pump-fake this game or season? He was infamous for double-clutching all the time in CLE, but I don't recall seeing him doing that much this season thus far (but maybe I've just not noticed). 

Edited by AlphabetsEnd
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

I'm still watching for the first time but I'm guessing for at least 5 of CMC's runs I've heard about. How does CMC run over 20 times and only has like 1 highlight lol

His best run of the game was called back on a holding penalty. In general, in rewatching, the Saints tackling kept him from breaking off anything really special. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, AlphabetsEnd said:

His best run of the game was called back on a holding penalty. In general, in rewatching, the Saints tackling kept him from breaking off anything really special. 

Yeah I also saw the Baker hate tweets earlier, but aside from missing a few in the first quarter, the Saints and McAdoo didn't make it very easy on him. FYI I'm just starting the second half and have no clue what happens next

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

 I can tell you now ickey was responsible a few of the hurries that led to baker taking a sack or throwing it away. However, at least this time it was just getting beat on the line. So progress is there but still needs to Improve on understanding/reading rush packages.

I saw one sack on BC getting beat on a stunt. It looked like the OL played fairly well in this game, TBH. By their standards, at least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...