Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

All 22 Breakdown Wk 4: Off vs Arizona Def


ChuckWag78
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Newtcase said:

This was a great watch.  Subbed to this guy.  

It's easy to blame McAdoo but man this guy really exposes the lack execution.  No doubt some of the poor execution is on McAdoo though, Ian Thomas is being schemed to do things he cannot do far too often. 

Other things that stood out.

  • CMC is good at football.
  • Moton had a bad game and may indeed be dealing with injury.
  • Icky looks very raw at times, not unexpected.
  • Baker is playing better than it appears, needs to be more patient.
  • Execution was poor in key moments and just about everyone took a turn.
  • A lot of the tips came when we were clearly running tempo, formation or circumstance may be tipping defense to abandon rush and get hands up.
  • Quite a few examples of receivers reading the route wrong, breaking it off early or running it lazy.

It was really a team mess taken as a whole.  There were a lot of opportunities to be successful where someone decided it was their turn to screw up.  The only player on the field that played like a professional the entire game was CMC. 

thanks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Newtcase said:

It was really a team mess taken as a whole.  There were a lot of opportunities to be successful where someone decided it was their turn to screw up.  The only player on the field that played like a professional the entire game was CMC. 

 

North Carolina Idk GIF by Carolina Panthers

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do agree that execution is really hurting, but I don't agree that scheme and playcalling (McAdoo) are not the central problem, across all four games. Having also done some independent All22 viewings, I'd agree with all of these, which is nice to see. I'll have to watch this breakdown and see the specifics:  

3 hours ago, Newtcase said:

 

  • CMC is good at football.
  • Moton had a bad game and may indeed be dealing with injury.
  • Icky looks very raw at times, not unexpected.
  • Baker is playing better than it appears, needs to be more patient.
  • Execution was poor in key moments and just about everyone took a turn.
  • A lot of the tips came when we were clearly running tempo, formation or circumstance may be tipping defense to abandon rush and get hands up.
  • Quite a few examples of receivers reading the route wrong, breaking it off early or running it lazy.

It was really a team mess taken as a whole.  There were a lot of opportunities to be successful where someone decided it was their turn to screw up.  The only player on the field that played like a professional the entire game was CMC. 

 

The only thing I'll add is that CMC was also hurt, and still played well when it mattered, even when they were running him up the gut. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm halfway through, I'd put 70% of the issues on McAdoo, Baker doesn't read the field very well at times, and the line/TE's are pretty sloppy in the run game but for the most part that goes back to the OC and forcing guys into his archaic system. I remember reading articles about how the Browns were struggling with Baker when only* running playing action 25% of the time. I don't even know if we've been running it 10% of the time with McAdoo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2022 at 12:26 PM, Newtcase said:

The only player on the field that played like a professional the entire game was CMC. 

I've only watched once, and not with a deep-dive breakdown in mind, but wouldn't Luvu also mostly fall into this category?

He seemed to play well from what I remember, or did he have his moments where he screwed up as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Raskle said:

I've only watched once, and not with a deep-dive breakdown in mind, but wouldn't Luvu also mostly fall into this category?

He seemed to play well from what I remember, or did he have his moments where he screwed up as well?

it was an offensive breakdown only, so CMC was the most blameless.

Luvu played really well, for my two cents from the ALL22 viewings, but didn't get included in Duncan's breakdown. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

I'm halfway through, I'd put 70% of the issues on McAdoo, Baker doesn't read the field very well at times, 

I think the improvement I took away from game 2 to 4, was that on a few plays versus the Cardinals, Mayfield maybe didn't make the best read, but he still took a check down or completed a pass to a TE. Earlier games he scrambled, missed passes entirely. The drops and batted passes really detract how few really bad throws Mayfield made in game 4 versus earlier games. 

Our play action rate is sub 10% I believe, and that is one of Mayfield's strengths. Very odd we're acting like the offense is allergic to it. Even Rodgers says so: https://www.sportskeeda.com/nfl/news-aaron-rodgers-impressed-one-baker-mayfield-s-quarterback-skills

Rodgers can't be wrong, right? 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...