Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Unless you can get multiple picks for each, trading Moore and CMC would be pointless and dumb.


panthersgreenville
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

thats a huge difference in NFL years. That's when players make the biggest impact and get their third contract.

Not for RBs. I just went back like 5 years and looked at top 5 or so rushing leaders for each year, they’re all under 27 (the site I was looking at was giving current age not age at the time of the stat so I can’t be much more specific than that.)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Not for RBs. I just went back like 5 years and looked at top 5 or so rushing leaders for each year, they’re all under 27 (the site I was looking at was giving current age not age at the time of the stat so I can’t be much more specific than that.)

CMC is 4 years from 30... I dont know why you are choosing to die on a hill that he is old. He is one year older than DJ.  He is younger than Dalvin Cook, Zeke, Hunt, Nick Chubb, and Alvin Kamara.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

CMC is 4 years from 30... I dont know why you are choosing to die on a hill that he is old. He is one year older than DJ.  He is younger than Dalvin Cook, Zeke, Hunt, Nick Chubb, and Alvin Kamara.

I said in 2 years, which is at least how far away we probably are from competing, if not more. The point was to trade him now BEFORE he got to that point. I’m not dying on a hill that he is old 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is absolutely no sense in trading DJ. CMC only if he can get us GOOD assets. He’s too valuable to us to offload for a mere 2nd or less. Even on the pessimistic side and he only has a couple good years left, two years of CMC is far better for us than five years of whatever they get in the second round beyond lucking into some star. Realistically you get a maybe decent starter in the second, not a star. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I can't see any team giving up a #1 for CMAC before the trading deadline. If he has a productive year and proves he can play in a majority of the games I could see a contending team possibly parting with a round one choice if they're drafting at the end of the first round (picks 26-32). Those choices are usually for playoff teams and a player like Christian could be the missing piece to put someone over the top. The choice available to a team in that area of the draft is likely to be less productive than CMAC. The only big issue is the cap hit. Can they absorb the big salary w/out going over the cap?

Then, we need to ask ourselves will the player will get lessen the impact of the loss of CMAC. In most cases I'd venture to say no.

Edited by SCO96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like both players a lot but I would trade either for a first round or a high 2nd round IF they could make it work with cap numbers and free up money to spread around to get more players in free agency.  
 

CMC is always hurt and running back is one of the easiest spots to replace.  I understand Moore has had awful QB play but I don’t see him as some superstar WR either.  I can’t think of a single game that’s he’s ever taken over and he averages four TD’s a season.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Maryland Cat said:

I understand Moore has had awful QB play but I don’t see him as some superstar WR either.  I can’t think of a single game that’s he’s ever taken over and he averages four TD’s a season.  

I can tell u from experience, this argument never goes over well here. I’ve tried to objectively state similar things and have been met with a lot of bias.

I will say tho that his contract is solid and if we drafted a QB, we can’t set him up to fail by giving him zero receivers. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could realistically expect a 2nd and a 5 for Moore and a 4th or something in that ballpark. How many teams want to trade for WRs right now though? The only standouts are Greenbay and Chicago. Green Bay is a WR from being a playoff team and Chicago needs Mooney to go back to being a 2 and it would give Justin Fields 2 NFL caliber WRs. 
 

Texans could be another team with picks to give but then it’s a money issue for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Varking said:

You could realistically expect a 2nd and a 5 for Moore and a 4th or something in that ballpark. How many teams want to trade for WRs right now though? The only standouts are Greenbay and Chicago. Green Bay is a WR from being a playoff team and Chicago needs Mooney to go back to being a 2 and it would give Justin Fields 2 NFL caliber WRs. 
 

Texans could be another team with picks to give but then it’s a money issue for them. 

Ridiculous. devonte adams and Tyreek Hill set the compensation market for wr trades at 2 first round picks and change. Moore would Garner that easily as his stats compare and he is cheaper contractually than both of those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Ridiculous. devonte adams and Tyreek Hill set the compensation market for wr trades at 2 first round picks and change. Moore would Garner that easily as his stats compare and he is cheaper contractually than both of those.

Devonte Adams and Tyreek Hill are in a class above DJ Moore. Like in 2022 alone Adams has 5 TDS already. That’s more than DJ has had in any one season. Hills lowest scoring total was 6 tds as a rookie. DJ has never had more than 4 in a year. 
 

Scoring outweighs yardage totals. Adams is a red zone threat who can gut people deep. Hill is a game wrecker. DJ Moore isn’t on that level yet. 


 

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I still think it's too soon to say last year's draft was bad. I think those who do are the eternal pessimists. We had 4 players who contributed last season. Two were starters. It's possible all 4 are starters this season. How is that a bad draft? I know it's because our roster was so bad but still, they are on this roster so it's the only one that counts.  Before I say it's a bad draft I prefer to wait and see how they play this season. It's possible we may have FIVE starters from that draft playing the season. Anyone who thinks drafting 5 starters by season two is a bad draft should visit a psychiatrist where they can get a prescription to help them live happier lives.    I'm not saying it was a success yet but I damn sure ain't calling it a failure yet. Most players don't make it. Most of those who do need a little time. One season isn't enough time which is why they are still on the team Leggete, Coker (UDFA but still we got him), Sanders, Smith-Wade and Wallace all showed promise last season. If they all take a step forward then it was a great draft. If only 1 does than it was an average draft. If they regress then and only then will I say it was a bad draft.  Fans often have unreasonable expectations compared to the reality of draft results. I believe this draft will shine as I think it's going to better due to the depth of the class but I also believe we will look back at 2024 and say that was a good class too. I think we have 5 players from that class who will be starters or rotational pieces for the next couple of years at least. That's a win.     
    • Playing devils adovcate here, but if you truly wanted to trade down then it made no sense to be a smoke screen for Walker only.  Especially since Tmac is not a generational type player.  Make it known that he is in play and see if the cowboys or whoever really like him as rumored. 
    • I mean everybody was, there is a difference between wanting them to draft the guy you like and accepting them drafting someone else based off all the intel and rumors. Up until draft night everybody was convinced it was gonna be walker or maybe another defensive player. If you didn't you was just crossing your fingers. 
×
×
  • Create New...