Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jonathan Stewart to discuss the Matt Rhule era and interim Coach Steve Wilkes at 8pm tonight on the C3 Panthers Podcast


trueblade
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Please be juicy. So much BS in the air that it is a suffocating crap mist at this point. What does he know and what really went on. Let it rip Stew

i'd be shocked if stewart says anything outside of the generic football speak that most players feed the public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, demcj said:

i'd be shocked if stewart says anything outside of the generic football speak that most players feed the public.

Rhule was such a control freak and it is confirmed that he wanted to control the PR naritive so there is plenty that could spill because of that extreamly unusual circumstance. Stew isn't a coach so I don't know why he would give generic football speach like someone giving a presser.

Stew isn't a Rhule guy so there is zero reasons for him to fluff any facts. I don't think it will be a hit job but there is a lot of ground of failure to cover on the subject of Rhule. I do expect to hear him speak about Wilks in a golden light but yeah there is plenty that could come out about the BS going on under Rhule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Please be juicy. So much BS in the air that it is a suffocating crap mist at this point. What does he know and what really went on. Let it rip Stew

Stew was a great resource for Panthers inside info when he was on the team. Smart and transparent guy. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Stew was a great resource for Panthers inside info when he was on the team. Smart and transparent guy. 

I actually used to hang out with J Stew when he was really digging into his music business. Now, by hang out with... I was a friend of his friend... i dont want that to get misconstrued. I think the only reason I was able to tag along was because I was J-Stew's "apple guy." 

That being said, he is such a funny ass person and super laid back. I actually never really talked Panthers with him during that period of time... I always thought it was an annoying subject to bring up.  Looking forward to what he has to say tonight.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I actually used to hang out with J Stew when he was really digging into his music business. Now, by hang out with... I was a friend of his friend... i dont want that to get misconstrued. I think the only reason I was able to tag along was because I was J-Stew's "apple guy." 

That being said, he is such a funny ass person and super laid back. I actually never really talked Panthers with him during that period of time... I always thought it was an annoying subject to bring up.  Looking forward to what he has to say tonight.

Nice, we probably have some mutual friends then. I knew a dude from my HS who were pals with him too, went golfing with him. Two former Panther players went to my HS too. He was one Panthers player I always thought I could have been friends with if I ever met him because I'm a musician too but I moved to Austin haha

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Nice, we probably have some mutual friends then. I knew a dude from my HS who were pals with him too, went golfing with him. Two former Panther players went to my HS too. He was one Panthers player I always thought I could have been friends with if I ever met him because I'm a musician too but I moved to Austin haha

Its possible! I went golfing with him and shaq at Piper Glen, they were just picking it up. It was actually a really fun time. My buddy is a former OSU quarterback and he was bffs with Andrew Norwell... that was my main connection. It also helped that I worked at the South Park Apple store as a "Genius" and quickly became a handlful of Panthers players "apple guy." 

 

Those were the good ol days.... didnt make poo for money, but got invited to tons of poo because of my Apple status, ahhaha.

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, RenoCarolina said:

How much more franchise/fan energy do we want to waste on Rhule? 

I'm more than ready to move on.  Right after I post this.

This is the recovering from getting rid of a crazy ex period. Once the new fling happens, we'll just have an occasional story about how bad this all was. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...