Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is replacing McAdoo now really that hard after watching this offense today?


SmokinwithWilly
 Share

Recommended Posts

Our offense is a hot mess. It's predictable. It's elementary. Its boring. There is nothing dangerous about it other than causing someone to fall asleep on the job. 

I know they say replacing an OC mid-season and implementing a new offense is difficult but how hard is it to upgrade this mess and implement some new schemes. McAdoo ain't it. 

This isn't a knee jerk reaction thread. I'm serious. How hard would it be to implement a new offensive scheme or get a new OC to expand the one we have? I realize getting anyone here would be very difficult given our current situation. But we can't keep doing this if we want anyone to not request a trade out of this hot mess. 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

At 1-5 why would you replace him. Let this limp dick offense lead us to C.J. Stroud.

Because I want players to stay. We aren't going to be able to attract a good HC if all the offensive pieces are done and want out. Robbie is done but he has been. DJ looks like he doesn't care. We're going to end up creating a toxic environment no one wants to be part of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean PJ averaged almost a 70% completion in his starts vs the Cardinals and Lions.  You can’t say you can’t scheme up some basic/low risk stuff for him to do between the 20s. 

if McAdoo can’t pull that off he serves no purpose.  

McAdoo probably worse at his job than PJ is at his.  Which isn’t as PJ compliment. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Because I want players to stay. We aren't going to be able to attract a good HC if all the offensive pieces are done and want out. Robbie is done but he has been. DJ looks like he doesn't care. We're going to end up creating a toxic environment no one wants to be part of. 

I get that, but I only want guys to be here that want to be here… if they want out when it’s bad then they don’t deserve to be here when it finally turns around.

They get paid millions of dollars to play a children’s game… basically, it’s “suck it up butter cup” season and come back next year with a new staff ready to roll. Daboll has shown that a good staff can turn around a team quickly… for the guys that want out… don’t let the door hit you in the dick (or something like that) on the way out.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Because I want players to stay. We aren't going to be able to attract a good HC if all the offensive pieces are done and want out. Robbie is done but he has been. DJ looks like he doesn't care. We're going to end up creating a toxic environment no one wants to be part of. 

How many guys are really worth keeping, we’re already taking calls for CMC. Moore, Ickey, Moton, Corbett and maybe BC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...