Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Titans are getting a new stadium.... Your move Charlotte / NC


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I think Austin would do well but obviously there would be an issue with them already having a soccer team. But I agree, Austin has a really nice fanbase for their soccer team. The USMNT even started playing some games there.

Why would FC Charlotte have to move too? Is their something contracted between them and the Panthers where they have to share everything? There's a list of owners who have teams in different cities. I, just so everyone knows, don't think the Panthers are ever moving. But it is possible to own teams in different places.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MillionDollarCam said:

I think Austin would do well but obviously there would be an issue with them already having a soccer team. But I agree, Austin has a really nice fanbase for their soccer team. The USMNT even started playing some games there.

Austin alone might struggle to support an NFL team but if they put the stadium in the city proper but a stadium in between SA and Austin I think could have great success. 45 min from each city. Hell put it near the outlet mall in San Marcos haha. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Why would FC Charlotte have to move too? Is their something contracted between them and the Panthers where they have to share everything? There's a list of owners who have teams in different cities. I, just so everyone knows, don't think the Panthers are ever moving. But it is possible to own teams in different places.

As I said in a previous post, the MLS despises their teams playing in NFL stadiums. The MLS would force Tepper to build a soccer specific stadium and he’d be on the hook for that himself, no way in hell the city would help out.

For reference…

Who owns Atlanta United… Arthur Blank…

Who owns the New England Revolution… Robert Kraft

That’s why those teams above also play in NFL stadiums.

The Sounders and Fire also play in NFL stadiums but I can guarantee you that if the Seahawks or Bears ever moved then the NFL would force the owners of those teams to build soccer specific stadiums as well.

It also makes no sense to keep Charlotte FC here, there’s a lot of crossover between the fanbases of the Panthers and Charlotte FC… Tepper would destroy half the Charlotte FC fanbase if he moved the Panthers and left Charlotte FC in Charlotte.

Also, do you think that cheap bastard would be okay with footing the rent in one city for his soccer team and in another city for his football team? The whole reason the teams are sharing a building now is to save Tepper money.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

As I said in a previous post, the MLS despised their teams playing in NFL stadiums. The MLS would force Tepper to build a soccer specific stadium.

Who owns Atlanta United… Arthur Blank…

Who owns the New England Revolution… Robert Kraft

That’s why those teams above also play in NFL stadiums.

The Sounders and Fire also play in NFL stadiums but I can guarantee you that if the Seahawks or Bears ever moved then the NFL would force the owners of those teams to build soccer specific stadiums.

It also makes no sense to keep Charlotte FC here, there’s a lot of crossover between the fanbases of the Panthers and Charlotte FC… Tepper would destroy half the Charlotte FC fanbase if he moved the Panthers and left Charlotte FC in Charlotte.

Also, do you think that cheap bastard would be okay with footing the rent in one city for his soccer team and in another city for his football team? The whole reason the teams are sharing a building now is to save Tepper money.

NYCFC plays in Yankees stadium ... or Mets stadium. There are no concrete plans to have a new stadium. That is way worse than playing in an NFL stadium. MLS will not force him to do anything. That said, Panthers aren't moving and Charlotte FC is going to play in BOA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

NYCFC plays in Yankees stadium ... or Mets stadium. There are no concrete plans to have a new stadium. That is way worse than playing in an NFL stadium. MLS will not force him to do anything. That said, Panthers aren't moving and Charlotte FC is going to play in BOA.

Yes, they are playing in that stadium because it’s readily available and it’s a shared stadium… not sure what’s so difficult to understand here.

There isn’t an MLS soccer specific stadium that has a capacity over 30K… which BofA would instantly become if the Panthers left.

So yes… the MLS would force him build a soccer specific stadium.

If you think Don Garber is going to let one of his teams play in a stadium that has a capacity of 70K and is the only tenant then you are out of your damn mind.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Yes, they are playing in that stadium because it’s readily available and it’s a shared stadium… not sure what’s so difficult to understand here.

There isn’t an MLS soccer specific stadium that has a capacity over 30K… which BofA would instantly become if the Panthers left.

So yes… the MLS would force him build a soccer specific stadium.

If you think Don Garber is going to let one of his teams play in a stadium that has a capacity of 70K and is the only tenant then you are out of your damn mind.

They play in Yankees/Mets/RedBull stadiums/arena bc they have no where else to go, and bc you can't just up and build something here without shelling out a ton of money. Why would MLS force Tepper to use his own money to build something new? We sure as hell know the city of Charlotte won't foot the bill, and Tepper won't pay for an arena of his own. They'd fold most likely. But again, doesn't matter. No one is going anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Have to keep in mind that Tepper shot himself in the dick by adding an MLS team. If he moves one, he’s going to have to move the other.

Austin already has an MLS team and I can damn near guarantee you that the MLS would nix a move to OKC.

If there ever was to be a move, San Antonio is probably the only option.

Edit - Sorry, quoted the wrong person, meant to quote @TheBigKat

San Antonio City Council isn't going to sell him the Alamodome. They do just fine with their own events and concerts, I have a hard time seeing them interested in giving Tepper any money so he can build his own place. It would be nice if Cities got away from letting NFL owners own the actual stadiums they play in unless they can afford their own poo

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

They play in Yankees/Mets/RedBull stadiums/arena bc they have no where else to go, and bc you can't just up and build something here without shelling out a ton of money. Why would MLS force Tepper to use his own money to build something new? We sure as hell know the city of Charlotte won't foot the bill, and Tepper won't pay for an arena of his own. They'd fold most likely. But again, doesn't matter. No one is going anywhere.

All of that is incorrect, NYCFC is getting a stadium and it could be done by 2025, they are currently playing in Yankee stadium because who owns them besides (City Football)… Yankee Global Enterprises… NYCFC only plays at Red Bull Arena when there is a stadium conflict.

As I said before, Charlotte FC is going with Tepper if he he somehow got to move the Panthers… why… because 1) the MLS would be absolutely pissed about one of their teams being the only tenant in a 70K stadium and 2) Tepper isn’t going to pay the rent for two stadiums.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 4Corners said:

What you said makes sense to most of us, however you are not taking into consideration how a billionaire who wants free poo thinks. 

Well it's not up to him, it has to be voted on across all owners and since the NFL is mostly a profit sharing model it wouldn't make sense to the others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

Well it's not up to him, it has to be voted on across all owners and since the NFL is mostly a profit sharing model it wouldn't make sense to the others.

You don’t think that the NFL owners will blindly agree with whatever cockeyed scheme a member of their exclusive club comes up with? I think you are mistaken. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...