Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF grades from Week 6


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I thought someone posted Icky had the 2nd highest grade at LT this week?

Icky has a good pass blocking grade.  Because he wasn't asked to pass pro in reality.  He did some pass pro on screens.  So the gameplan basically created a bit of a bogus stat on that. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RenoCarolina said:

Twitter disinformation;

 

ikem.png

 

Quote

Rookie spotlight: Panthers first-round offensive tackle Ikem Ekwonu had a roller-coaster game. He looked impressive as a pass-protector, allowing zero pressures on 19 pass-blocking snaps. He struggled in the run game though, which was his bread-and-butter in college. He earned just a 40.6 run-blocking grade on first review — a far cry from his rookie-record 98.0 grade from a week ago.

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-week-6-game-recap-los-angeles-rams-24-carolina-panthers-10

They apparently gave him really low marks for run-blocking despite most of CMC's success coming off the left edge, according to his run chart that's been posted in here.  Still seems strange for an 85.9 pass blocking grade + 40.6 run-blocking grade to come out to a 45.0 overall grade.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

 

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-week-6-game-recap-los-angeles-rams-24-carolina-panthers-10

They apparently gave him really low marks for run-blocking despite most of CMC's success coming off the left edge, according to his run chart that's been posted in here.  Still seems strange for an 85.9 pass blocking grade + 40.6 run-blocking grade to come out to a 45.0 overall grade.

I mean, a lot of those screen don't really put you in pass protection.    I wonder if those don't really grade as pass protection reps.  

PJ threw like 5 actual passes. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I mean, a lot of those screen don't really put you in pass protection.    I wonder if those don't really grade as pass protection reps.  

PJ threw like 5 actual passes. 

 

I'm referencing PFF's own 85.9 pass-blocking rating, so dissecting their criteria as far as what constitutes a pass play or not doesn't really seem relevant.  That 85.9 rating would have already accounted for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MasterAwesome said:

I'm referencing PFF's own 85.9 pass-blocking rating, so dissecting their criteria as far as what constitutes a pass play or not doesn't really seem relevant.  That 85.9 rating would have already accounted for that.

I know but if they aren't really counting/weighing those screen passes as real pass pro reps?   The rush reps pretty drastically outweigh the pass reps.  

For example, 1 pass pro rep you get a A+ vs 10 rush reps you get an F on.   You wouldn't get a C on the day.   The rush reps count more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years (Brown is the only current player I think there is even an argument to be made over T-Mac there), with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
    • Laughing at Slayton (Mooney or Calvin Austin III), but telling me that Coker is the next best thing since sliced bread...You laughing at Theo Johnson in reference to our guys too? LOL No one in their right mind thinks Nabers is anything but a stud (definitely top 10 if not 5 potential). You do realize that Thomas was in a new system with a furst-time coach last year (with a questionable QB to boot)? And yet still, it's possible that he eclipses even T-mac (not saying that he will). They didn't even mention Travis Hunter. In any event, we're not in the top half. Draft another legit receiver, and we will be. 
    • Absolutely, very fair assessment of the team. 
×
×
  • Create New...