Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC to the 49ers

Ricky Spanish

By Ricky Spanish,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

SCO96 Veteran

SCO96

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, Zod said:

2nd 3rd 4th 5th is fair for a guy that has barely played in two years.

But he's played well and hasn't missed a game this season. He is literally the only player on offense who has had a positive impact on the team other than Shenault for two plays in the New Orleans game. I can't imagine how bad this team is going be on offense for the rest of the year. 

We are clearly tanking for the the first round pick. When franchises do things like this it doesn't seem to  go as planned. I have no faith in an organization that has handled our player personnel and drafts so poorly the past 3 years. No team that has traded 1 RB should be hapless/inept on offense. Yet, we just lost 80% of our offensive production. And, we're suppose to think the people who built this roster are going to rebuild this team with solid draft choices  at the end or middle of rounds 2-4. Have you guys actually studie/analyzed the results of the players we tend to get in these rounds?  I'll believe it when I see it.

If we get a great offensive minded HC who is perfectly in sync with our GM (whoever that may be in 2023), then this could work. But, if our draft class follows the trend of our past 10 years or so we'll going to wind up with 3 or 4 Jags who could never start on another contending team in the NFL and continue or history of "sustained mediocrity."

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, Tbe said:

That too, but we need to surround this new QB with help and protection. 

I think a either a top center and linebacker falls to us in the 2nd.  Getting the top ranked center would be my wet dream.  I think there are 2 that are getting first round grades but if the qbs fill up in the first maybe someone gets pushed down

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tbe Grand Master

Tbe

Posted
Posted
Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

I think a either a top center and linebacker falls to us in the 2nd.  Getting the top ranked center would be my wet dream.  I think there are 2 that are getting first round grades but if the qbs fill up in the first maybe someone gets pushed down


Yeah, I want a center and WR in the 2nd.

I think we can fill RB and TE in free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
firefox1234 Grand Master

firefox1234

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, SCO96 said:

But he's played well and hasn't missed a game this season. He is literally the only player on offense who has had a positive impact on the team other than Shenault for two plays in the New Orleans game. I can't imagine how bad this team is going be on offense for the rest of the year. 

We are clearly tanking for the the first round pick. When franchises do things like this it doesn't seem to  go as planned. I have no faith in an organization that has handled our player personnel and drafts so poorly the past 3 years. No team that has traded 1 RB should be hapless/inept on offense. Yet, we just lost 80% of our offensive production. And, we're suppose to think the people who built this roster are going to rebuild this team with solid draft choices  at the end or middle of rounds 2-4. Have you guys actually studie/analyzed the results of the players we tend to get in these rounds?  I'll believe it when I see it.

If we get a great offensive minded HC who is perfectly in sync with our GM (whoever that may be in 2023), then this could work. But, if our draft class follows the trend of our past 10 years or so we'll going to wind up with 3 or 4 Jags who could never start on another contending team in the NFL and continue or history of "sustained mediocrity."

Elephant in the room. Our draft post round 1 has been questionable at best for decades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

I think a either a top center and linebacker falls to us in the 2nd.  Getting the top ranked center would be my wet dream.  I think there are 2 that are getting first round grades but if the qbs fill up in the first maybe someone gets pushed down

Good thing Centers rarely get drafted in the first round. I’m sure they will be there in the 2nd. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

Congrats Frank lmfao. I know nobody hates CMC more than your punk ass. Pop some bubbly and enjoy your night. Lol

You're big mad huh? Hopefully you slept it off today is a new day bud!

Edited by frankw
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

But he's played well and hasn't missed a game this season. He is literally the only player on offense who has had a positive impact on the team other than Shenault for two plays in the New Orleans game. I can't imagine how bad this team is going be on offense for the rest of the year. 

We are clearly tanking for the the first round pick. When franchises do things like this it doesn't seem to  go as planned. I have no faith in an organization that has handled our player personnel and drafts so poorly the past 3 years. No team that has traded 1 RB should be hapless/inept on offense. Yet, we just lost 80% of our offensive production. And, we're suppose to think the people who built this roster are going to rebuild this team with solid draft choices  at the end or middle of rounds 2-4. Have you guys actually studie/analyzed the results of the players we tend to get in these rounds?  I'll believe it when I see it.

If we get a great offensive minded HC who is perfectly in sync with our GM (whoever that may be in 2023), then this could work. But, if our draft class follows the trend of our past 10 years or so we'll going to wind up with 3 or 4 Jags who could never start on another contending team in the NFL and continue or history of "sustained mediocrity."

you just don’t get it man, but if you follow me on Twitter you’ll see that I’ve got some really excellent write ups on some exciting middle round prospects that I discovered due to my vast scouting mind and YouTube.com

follow me at Twitter.com/draftsagemaster17notaforumguyliterallyascoutingguru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
    • TD alt
      Monroe Freeling’s lovely GF

      By TD alt · Posted

      He was also apparently.
×
×
  • Create New...