Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other Games


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

What's that old saying again? If you have more than one QB then you don't actually have a QB? 😂

I think Zappe has the moxie and good natured attitude to be a Minchew or Fitzmagic type. Basically a career backup that has some moments as a bridge starter type.  I'm not sure where I see Jones. If he has the right mentality he could make it as a backup too but he just seems like a douchebag and has twice now tried to blatantly injure opponents with dirty bullshit. Not sure that's stuff is gonna fly for a backup.

Either way, the Pats should be QB shopping this off-season.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

What's that old saying again? If you have more than one QB then you don't actually have a QB? 😂

I think Zappe has the moxie and good natured attitude to be a Minchew or Fitzmagic type. Basically a career backup that has some moments as a bridge starter type.  I'm not sure where I see Jones. If he has the right mentality he could make it as a backup too but he just seems like a douchebag and has twice now tried to blatantly injure opponents with dirty bullshit. Not sure that's stuff is gonna fly for a backup.

Either way, the Pats should be QB shopping this off-season.

lol I just quoted that to a few Pats fans at the office today who laughed at me saying the Bears would win and Mac sucks and Zappe isn't the answer. Who's laughing now bitches

Also, saw Mac kicked a Bears dude in the nuts today, what a dirty piece of poo. Still pissed about that crap he did to Burns 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

That whole late round backup coming in and dominating for 20 years thing died pretty fast this time.

pats fans are so delusional, I had guys at my office in Boston here today saying Zappe is a top 5-10 QB, like seriously gtfo losers

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

That whole late round backup coming in and dominating for 20 years thing died pretty fast this time.

We keep looking for the next Cam (it's a big part of why people wanted Fields). NE will keep looking for the next Brady. Guys like Cam and Brady cast long shadows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...