Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, no love to Henderson


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He has at least one WTF play every game.   I seriously doubt we pick up his 5th year option and he is probably off the team next year.  His play is easily replaceable 

That's my thing with him, and it is a pull your hair out WTF play. Also, his issues make you really angry because they seem like a lack of attention to detail. He will just be completely coasting and give up a huge play. I'll be looking like what was he doing, thinking, see? It boggles the mind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, top dawg said:

C.J. Henderson had great coverage and an even better interception on what should've been the origin of the winning drive. He deserves a little respect this morning.

If you're going to give Moore praise for redeeming himself, you should give Henderson some praise for redeeming himself. That was a magnificent play.

 

I got nothing for him, he made a play that he is capable of.  The bad part of that is his complete lack of effort and football IQ 99% of the time outside of that.  The play just makes it all the more frustrating since he has the talent, but none of the effort or brains.

Useless trade, he should not be on this team.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CRA said:

his ratio of good to bad IMO is still too heavily skewed to the bad. 

It was a nice pick.  Lot of bad players make a great play here or there.  

 

Bad players don't make great plays. Bad players are on a couch somewhere, not on an NFL team. Let alone, lots of them.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, at the time that wouldn't have worked for them. The truth is that when they had the biggest advantage in that conversation was also when Notre Dame was at their peak arrogance and revenue stream creation(prior to the Longhorns Network, etc). Notre Dame was just never going to work out. The biggest thing they could have done is go hard AF and try to give insane deals to the premier Big 12 teams. Even then, most of them were eyeing the Big Ten and SEC. The biggest issue with the ACC was betting wrong. Miami and Virginia Tech ended up being disasters. Basically former college football powerhouses that ended up being afterthoughts by the time they arrived. I mean Miami specifically have literally had a total of three double digit win seasons since they joined the ACC in 2004 and two of those are in the past 2 seasons. Virginia Tech just fell apart at the wrong time, although I think Franklin will bring them back to prominence to an extent. Had we had it to do in hindsight, probably taking teams like TCU, Baylor, etc would have been wiser options than some of the moves into the Northeast and getting Miami.   But, ultimately, fug all this nonsense. It's the insane greed of college football that killed regional rivalries, college basketball and entire storied, REGIONAL conferences. That is the real blame. The thirst for the destruction of all college sports which sits squarely at the feet of the slobbering, ignorant rednecks and hillbillies at the top of the college football sphere.
    • Im wondering how long it will take me to turn the game off
×
×
  • Create New...