Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Strength of schedule analysis


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

By ESPN analyst Mike Clay...

Clay admits here that this is based on his own opinion of each team, but with that said when you look down the list of our remaining games, it's valid to say that it doesn't look anywhere near as tough as it once did.

Outside of the Ravens game, I don't see anything that looks absolutely unwinnable.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see one definite loss the rest of the way - Baltimore. 

Seattle and Cincy could be losses depending which defense shows up. The one that throttled TB12 or the one that couldn't get off the field in ATL.

Honestly the rest of those I could see us being favored in every other game. I expect that the next month and a half of the season will be a rollercoaster every week bouncing in and out of a top 10 pick and leading the Division. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, roaddog96 said:

I’ve given up the tank already after seeing the team under Wilks. That schedule is too easy for us to not win at least 3-4 more games.

yeah, this team and this coach doesn't want to quit. i don't blame them. losing sucks. it might be a good strategic move from some perspectives, but for people involved whose livelihood and sense of pride is on the line, losing is no good. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The frustrating thing is Carolina should probably be at worst 4-4 (Browns and Falcons games should have been Ws) and leading the division. I suppose in the grand scheme a top 5 pick is better to be able to hopefully land a franchise QB, but this team absolutely would've been able to compete this season. I wonder what the record would've been if Rhule was fired last offseason and a better coaching staff had been in place all offseason... 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For context:

- Per Clay, the easiest remaining schedule belongs to the Falcons

- Our other NFC South rivals sit at #10 (Saints) and #15 (Bucs)

- Five contending teams (Ravens, Eagles, 49ers, Cowboys and Chiefs) sit at #s 2 through 6

- The two teams currently ahead of us in draft order sit at 16 (Lions) and 28 (Texans)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say Cincinnati and Seattle would be pretty hard to win. The others... We are going to have to be really bad to not win at least 1 more game. Which would drop us to the 5th pick or lower. The entire league has been terrible this year including us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

By ESPN analyst Mike Clay...

Clay admits here that this is based on his own opinion of each team, but with that said when you look down the list of our remaining games, it's valid to say that it doesn't look anywhere near as tough as it once did.

Outside of the Ravens game, I don't see anything that looks absolutely unwinnable.

That makes about as much sense as feeding a hog sausage.  Oh wait, a hog will eat anything.  Good job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am just saying that there are realistic alternatives to the Dan is totally Fitterer in all his opinions and incapable of his own mind. Because we don’t know what really happened.     And your job is to support your boss even if you aren’t 100% in agreement.  And further you do not publicly dissent.  Publicly meaning when more than just the two of you are around.    ISO believe he is doing Tepper’s bidding on a lot of things and I believe it was very likely as a new hire, in 2024.  If I were to speculate further I would think that Canales has a big say in the offensive evaluations and Dan might not feel like he should be flatly overruling him since he is not an offensive guy. Any differences of opinion, if Canales feels strongly about an evaluation or decision Dan would be more likely to go with Dave than to overrule.    But can’t claim to know anything with any certainty.    I do think Dan showed us some solid work in this draft.    I also am WTF no QB competition. But I know we agree that it wouldn’t take much to show Bruce up and it seems like they were avoiding that.   In the big picture of the developmental arc they may have decided on, maybe that was okay for year two. It will absolutely not be okay for next year. And Canales has brought Hookernin so that is a small move in the direction we wanted them to go.     
    • Just to be clear no one in the front office at the time before or immediately following the 2023 draft including Fitterer Morgan or Reich was saying Bryce Young would need the highest paid OL in the entire league which we now have just to look halfway serviceable.
    • Come on dude, he's only 2 spots below SB champ Hurts. That's awesome!
×
×
  • Create New...