Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Insight into trade rumors

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Camp Fodder said:

Yea remember that time we interviewed him and hired Gettleman  instead?  Good times 

member the time where JR fired gettlegut after bills hired Billy 4 months before.......after panthers spent 17 years in developing him. 

Round 2 of give me a Herniay to the rescue.....fresh off his radio gig.....how did anyone stand his voice??

fug JR set this team back 20+ years with this dumbass move.....hernia in tuen browned up Tepper and helped tepper hire Rhule and now we are back to start.....fug 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Captain Morgan said:

Brandon has done a great job, and he's young.  Interested that they weren't interested in Kamara.

In related news (since we don't have a NFL news thread that I can find, Mike Thomas was placed on IR today and isn't not expected to play this year.  Looks like the team told him twice to have surgery, and again he didn't....but now he will.  

"Thomas will have missed 40 over the past three. His future with the Saints is certainly in doubt in the wake of this news.

https://www.profootballrumors.com/2022/11/saints-to-place-michael-thomas-on-ir

Probably because Ole’ Alvin likes getting liquored up in the club and sucker punching people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Luciu5 Veteran

Luciu5

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Captain Morgan said:

Brandon has done a great job, and he's young.  Interested that they weren't interested in Kamara.

I don't think that is what was said. It's been a couple hours since I watched it, but I'm pretty sure...

They saw Kamara was available from somewhere (twitter, grapevine, w/e.)

Called them. Got no response back, so they did no research.

Media reported they were rejected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bigdog10 Experienced

bigdog10

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Wolfcop said:

I didn’t want to start a new thread, but just saw that the Rams offered 2 firsts and a second for Burns. Time for him to prove that kind of worth. That one may come back to haunt us. Hope I’m wrong. 

2023 Second (I assume)

2024 First

2025 First

That would have been an incredible haul. Those two firsts have potential to be top 15 picks over the next two years as the Rams look poised to regress with that oline and an aging Stafford. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, bigdog10 said:

2023 Second (I assume)

2024 First

2025 First

That would have been an incredible haul. Those two firsts have potential to be top 15 picks over the next two years as the Rams look poised to regress with that oline and an aging Stafford. 

100% agree. What a stupid decision. Primarily made because Burns is a short term puzzle piece for a GM who very likely won’t last long enough to use those draft picks.

That was QB level compensation for a tweener DE who sucks against the run and hasn’t even posted double digit sacks in a full season. What a dumb franchise we root for. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Primarily made because Burns is a short term puzzle piece for a GM who very likely won’t last long enough to use those draft picks.

There's zero indication Fitterer is on any sort of hot seat.

Just the opposite. Josh Klein, for example, described him as "very safe".

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted
Just now, Mr. Scot said:

There's zero indication Fitterer is on any sort of hot seat.

Just the opposite. Josh Klein, for example, described him as "very safe".

For now. If he turned down that package and the Rams stink in 2024 and 2025 we will regret that trade. He hasn’t done anything worth keeping him for IMO. But we will see how he does without Rhule making fathead decisions 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1of10Charnatives Mentor

1of10Charnatives

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, hepcat said:

 But we will see how he does without Rhule making fathead decisions 

This for me is the key. It's really hard to know how good or bad of a GM Fitts is because we don't know how much Fhule factored into all the decisions. All we can infer is that him being very safe would seem to imply Tepper knows or at least thinks most of the prior bad decisions were on Fhule and not Fitts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, hepcat said:

For now. If he turned down that package and the Rams stink in 2024 and 2025 we will regret that trade. He hasn’t done anything worth keeping him for IMO. But we will see how he does without Rhule making fathead decisions 

Not so sure our owner agrees.

Frankly, I'd put a pretty high likelihood on the criteria for what we would or wouldn't accept for guys like Moore and Burns having been discussed with Tepper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

This for me is the key. It's really hard to know how good or bad of a GM Fitts is because we don't know how much Fhule factored into all the decisions. All we can infer is that him being very safe would seem to imply Tepper knows or at least thinks most of the prior bad decisions were on Fhule and not Fitts.

You’re also assuming David Tepper has even the slightest ability to construct a winning franchise which he has shown no inclination of being able to do….

Turning down the Burns package was a massive mistake and Rhule isn’t here.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CPF4LIFE
      Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples

      By CPF4LIFE · Posted

      From what i see, Canales offense requires a QB that is willing to take chances to maximize the offense. XL is also the kind of receiver that needs a qb to be risky to bring out his full potential. Its just a matter of if Bryce is gonna be that QB.
    • CRA
      Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples

      By CRA · Posted

      Baker just played how Baker played.... everywhere but here. He is a risk taking gunslinger.  Always has been.  And last year was asked to be what he was.   Geno Smith was the best deep ball passer in the NFL his comeback season.  Wasn't even close that year.  Again, that's the type passer Canales has always been around in the offenses he has been part of.  The pass game that compliments the stubborn run is the deep chunk play pass game.   And that was his first investment with XL.  My continued point, is the same as going into last season.  It's a bad marriage going in.  The QB doesn't fit the scheme.  Again.  Carrol/Fox/Ron....all paired up their boring football with risk taking QBs.  And again, I'm fine if that is where we are going.  It's not my preference but that's not my argument.  I'm saying if we are doing that, we need a QB that matches it.     
    • ForJimmy
      Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I guess you missed the point. His rushing attack was dead last yet his team still performed. That’s not Fox/Rivera ball. His QB also had a career year. Remember the same QB that played for us in the same division and was so bad he was cut?  Carroll coached after Lynch as well. In fact Canales was more involved in the more recent offense with Geno Smith and a good rushing attack. People are taking him wanting a rushing attack and assuming that means we are shutting down our passing attack. Again many of the top offenses like SF, Miami, and Detroit featured strong rushing attacks. 
×
×
  • Create New...