Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Justin Fields 61 yard rushing touchdown


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean, I don't think one game is grounds to be taking a victory lap.

I like Fields and wanted either him or Slater but I don't think I would call Justin a success yet.

Hopefully so.

I wanted Slater but when our turn came up I thought it would be Fields.

Horn wasn't on my radar with that pick

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

He's played well 3 games in a row. He's in his first year as a starter with a new coaching staff, it's called "Things are starting to click"

It's odd that you are in love with a guy who has never and will.never play for us.

Honestly I hope he fails. It's one less team to worry about in the NFC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean, I don't think one game is grounds to be taking a victory lap.

I like Fields and wanted either him or Slater but I don't think I would call Justin a success yet.

Hopefully so.

Fields behind our OL with Moore and CMC could have potential, but it might also mean Rhule would have hung around longer.  Nothing is worth that....

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Fields behind our OL with Moore and CMC could have potential, but it might also mean Rhule would have hung around longer.  Nothing is worth that....

Fields accuracy issue and decision making has nothing to do with his oline. The new coaching staff has learned the less he passes the better off they are on  Sundays. We are seeing peak Fields right now. It wont get any better than this.

His issue has always been accuracy and decision making, other than that he is an elite athlete.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean, I don't think one game is grounds to be taking a victory lap.

I like Fields and wanted either him or Slater but I don't think I would call Justin a success yet.

Hopefully so.

Slater would have been better than Horn too. An OT team with Icky and Slater would be nasty. Moton has got paid syndrome

Edited by Sean Payton's Vicodin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

He's played well 3 games in a row. He's in his first year as a starter with a new coaching staff, it's called "Things are starting to click"

 

9 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

The first part of the season yes.  He has been playing better his past several games.  It's like he is developing or something.  Now imagine what he will do if they give him an OL or some weapons.

He’s had two good games, how long have you waited for this? He’s still way below average and not worth making threads about. Cam had more TD and yards his rookie season than Fields has 20 games. I don’t give a fug how bad his weapons are he’s making them look worse than what they really are.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoobyPls said:

 

He’s had two good games, how long have you waited for this? He’s still way below average and not worth making threads about. Cam had more TD and yards his rookie season than Fields has 20 games. I don’t give a fug how bad his weapons are he’s making them look worse than what they really are.

He has had Nagy has his HC last year and this year he has been working with 2 5th round picks as tackles and no weapons to throw to.  I expected him to fail in those circumstances.  The fact he is showing any sort of life is impressive.  Why does that bother you?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Fields accuracy issue and decision making has nothing to do with his oline. The new coaching staff has learned the less he passes the better off they are on  Sundays. We are seeing peak Fields right now. It wont get any better than this.

His issue has always been accuracy and decision making, other than that he is an elite athlete.

Hold up; don’t you want Levis? Isn’t his accuracy and decision making in question?

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...