Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Willing to wait two more seasons?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

Obviously this team needs much more then a QB. They need Linebackers, DE, and DLine help. Offense needs TE help and probably a RB. WR would help also.

They can fill some of these in FA if the $$ is available.  Still have to resign some valuable OL players.

After watching that sh%tshow yesterday, the fact that they need help at many positions is obvious. Can't fill all these holes in one season. 

Probably will take two or three good drafts and FA signings to be competitive on a constant basis.

Are you okay with remaining patient while they finally built the team the right way?

No more throwing shat at the wall and see what sticks....

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A coach and a QB and this team can win this garbage division next year IMO.  Saints and Bucs are in the downswing and the Falcons are gonna be stuck without a QB.   Cap space wise it’ll probably be 2 years to be truly competitive if we get some competent leadership in, but it’s not as dire as everyone wants to make it.

Now is Tepper cable of bringing a competent coach in I have no idea.

Bengals were a much worse team when they added Burrow. It’s very possible to get good in a year or two.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

It shouldn't take 2 years to turn this into a winning team. It's been 5 years already.

Despite what Tepper and Rhule's dumbasses think, it doesn't take 7 years to make a winning team in the NFL.

We havent really started the rebuild yet though.....We will start again this offseason....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stan786 said:

A coach and a QB and this team can win this garbage division next year IMO.  Saints and Bucs are in the downswing and the Falcons are gonna be stuck without a QB.   Cap space wise it’ll probably be 2 years to be truly competitive if we get some competent leadership in, but it’s not as dire as everyone wants to make it.

Now is Tepper cable of bringing a competent coach in I have no idea.

Bengals were a much worse team when they added Burrow. It’s very possible to get good in a year or two.

we talking a vet qb or rookie qb?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The panthers are one of the biggest messes in the NFL and I have a hard time believing there’s any path to success under David Tepper. He is definitely gaining a rep of being hard to work for and the best writers like Scott Fowler have eluded to it given the crazy amount of attrition the organization has gone through under his ownership

we’re f*cked. Sell the team David. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

We havent really started the rebuild yet though.....We will start again this offseason....

We actually have been rebuilding continuously since 2017. It isn't a process that is required to be restarted. 

We just keep to keep improving the roster and make good decisions with free agents(our own and others).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...