Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ellis Williams. Char observer on top 4 QBs Note, This is not in depth


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

Any of them but Richardson. Clearly the worst of the four. 

I totally get him being a gamble but how can you say clearly the worst when he’s outperformed Levis against every single common opponent they have had this year? 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

A boom or bust prospect should at least be somewhat within the boom range.

I am not seeing that for Richardson. Outside of physically looking the part and having a good arm, he has no other valid QB qualities. That's a problem.

Even Levis has times where you clearly see QB qualities in his play. Richardson rarely had any.

Yeah but see, you can take any guy who's got great athletic characteristics and teach him how to play quarterback.

(or so I've been told) 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Go back and watch Josh Allen in college. You're gonna be shocked.

 

 

When I say he was wildly inaccurate I'm not exaggerating. Dude couldn't hit water from a fuging boat.

Sure, and this is the classic "Russell Wilson" or "Tom Brady" argument. If you base your projections on outliers, it usually ends up poorly.

Now, are his(Richardson's) issues with either mechanics and field vision correctable? Possibly. It's up to the scouting department to figure out if that is something he has tried to correct and simply cannot or just hasn't been developed correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CmC2k said:

Anthony Richardson can either be Josh Allen lite or Terrelle Pryor 2.0. It all depends on who drafts him and what plan they have to develop him. 

There are factors in that equation that we don't know anything about as laymen.

It may be that he isn't that coachable. It may be that he doesn't work on his craft. It may be that Florida's development is trash. 

Those aren't things most of us will ever know and all these evaluators will have to try and get a handle on.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

There are factors in that equation that we don't know anything about as laymen.

It may be that he isn't that coachable. It may be that he doesn't work on his craft. It may be that Florida's development is trash. 

Those aren't things most of us will ever know and all these evaluators will have to try and get a handle on.

 

The interview and background process is a huge part of the evaluation that we get minimal insight into as fans and it's utterly vital and anything that does come out is likely to be misinformation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I would write “give remmers tight end help” on a yellow sticky note and stuck it in shulas playbook the night before superbowl 50. 
    • And don’t worry about Bryce he will be great… Peyton Manning had a horrible rookie year too 😂
    • Nothing wrong with it at all until you start telling others they are bad fans or not fans. But you are the good fan because you never say negative stuff about the team.    I did many years of that type of uninformed fanning because there really was no info and coverage like there is with the internet.    I mean, I used to go to the store and get Street and Smith’s annual football issue. That was about the extent of what you could get if you didn’t live in a big city with sportswriters covering and reporting.  There was no video to look at or replay the games and if you didn’t live in the market you could only rarely see your football team play.    TI have fanned since being a kid in the early 1960s, and as late as 1995 - ‘97 I lived in Atlanta and good luck getting more than 3 or 4 games a year on TV. No radio either. No print coverage outside of an AP recap and box unless they played Atlanta.  People today that have always had the network connection don’t know.    I wasn’t very educated about the Panthers until I finally got internet. 
×
×
  • Create New...