Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let’s talk Division Title


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Teddy2SuperBowlHeartBreaks said:

I'll entertain this if the Saints win next Monday

Actually it’s pretty realistic look at the next two games say they win one and loose to the 49ers id we win the next two it’s a 6-7 team compared to a 6-8 team. We beat them already so it’s closer then we think. I’d say they louse to the bengals depending on that Lions game we may be tied for first in 3 weeks with two nfc matchups left. I’m starting to think it’s a realistic thing I wasn’t rooting for this but I’d never be mad at winning regardless of what happens in the playoffs. Winning breeds winning we need to get back to that type of culture forget the Fool way seven year fiasco crap he would spew. We are playing to win games if a bad qb can do enough to win let the D and good coaching take us as far as we can go and build upon that in the offseason.

Edited by trucpfan
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a 5 win team until proven otherwise.  But I like the grit they're showing.  The offensive play calling is still ass however.  But I get it, the qbs can't string two back to back winning performances together.  But they are going to break Forman and there's nobody behind he worth a roster spot. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

Didn't we do this after the Bucs game too? The 35 point deficit in the first half against the Bengals says hello.

We don’t have another Bengals type team on the schedule. Seattle is the toughest team remaining, and they have lost back to back. One to Tampa and today to Vegas at home. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Didn't we do this after the Bucs game too? The 35 point deficit in the first half against the Bengals says hello.

Yeah but there are a LOT of bad teams and our schedule is includes several of those bad teams plus division games in which we are 2-1. It is more likely that we win the division than it is we get a top 5 pick.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...