Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why the Panthers NEED Sean Payton..


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, MasterAwesome said:

I'm not saying this to you specifically, but I see this argument all the time about teams not wanting to trade within their division and I really don't understand it.  No team makes a trade they think they are losing out on, within the division or otherwise.  Either you think it's fair and balanced or you think you're getting the better end of it.  Trades are simply an exchange of assets and if you think you're getting more valuable assets from your trade partner than what you're giving up, then wouldn't you be more inclined to trade within the division and essentially "screw over" a rival?  If I'm the Saints, I'd love to take two of the Panthers' 1st round picks off their hands unless I actually think Payton is worth more than that.  In which case, I wouldn't trade him to any team for the same reason.

Like what is the unique logic applied to trading within your division that doesn't apply to trading outside of the division?  Is it something to do with said player/coach having inside knowledge?  Cause you could more-or-less get the same thing from signing some Practice Squad guy or some vet FA bum who previously played for that team.  Is it because that player/coach is gonna get some kind of motivational boost to try and stick it to their previous team?

It happens all the time. Name the last team to even trade a player to a rival. It's very rare. Most teams won't even trade draft position with a rival team much less a SB winning coach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Oh I know, I'm not disputing that it's a thing.  I'm only questioning the rationale behind it.

Just not wanting to risk your job making your division better. Kinda like not helping the guy who's shooting for your promotion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Nah.

Hell Nah. 

Want no part of Sean Payton.

Will not support the team in any way shape or form if he's ever part of it.

I feel sure Sean Payton wants nothing to do with the Panthers and I want the Panthers to have nothing to do with Sean Payton.  

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2022 at 6:29 PM, WarPanthers89 said:

“F*ck you. I’m drafting Chuba Hubbard. My wife told me it was not optional.”

D56AD201-DAA0-428F-B93E-063D0FB5A153.jpeg

I swear every time I see this picture I think of that kid in grade school that always crapped his pants.  Hell he looks like he just did or in the process. 

Edited by Barney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Bush is one of the biggest busts of all time, even with a relatively okay career. 

 

Dude was the “next Barry Sanders” and the Texans were ridiculed for drafting the better player #1. 
 

Bush was one of the most overhyped players in NFL draft history. 

Bush was a monster in college and just wasn't used correctly in the NFL.  If he was drafted now, he would probably be very dynamic in the league.  I'm not saying he would be CMC but he would be used like that.  I just think he was ahead of his time and not used correctly.  Also when he was drafted it wasn't a general consensus yet that RBs aren't worth getting picked that high but it was right at the cusp at the realization being made across the NFL.  We went and drafted CMC and ignored all the data though lol.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...