Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Richardson declares for the draft


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, trueblade said:

If we hire Ben Johnson (Lions OC) as new head coach, I could see him wanting to go after Goff to bridge to a rookie and/or Corral.

In all Honesty… I think Ben johnson would go after Levis… but if he couldn’t get him…. I wouldn’t be surprised if we kept darnold on a short term deal bc darnold would succeed in Johnson’s system.  He runs the shanny style offensive system. Basically, you use the left and right passing scheme to set up the up and down. All while maintaining the run heavy balance

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

In all Honesty… I think Ben johnson would go after Levis… but if he couldn’t get him…. I wouldn’t be surprised if we kept darnold on a short term deal bc darnold would succeed in Johnson’s system.  He runs the shanny style offensive system. Basically, you use the left and right passing scheme to set up the up and down. All while maintaining the run heavy balance

Levis with the right HC/OC and our good young OL could be interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

We're stuck in some kind of infinite loop it seems.

I wish we would completely purge all of the Rhule and Hurney people and go in a different direction. I'm still hoping for a consultant to be brought in because I don't believe in Fritterer without help and direction. 

Steichen looks like the prize this offseason. I'm still skeptical of Johnson and Waldron. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Waldo said:

I wish we would completely purge all of the Rhule and Hurney people and go in a different direction. I'm still hoping for a consultant to be brought in because I don't believe in Fritterer without help and direction. 

Steichen looks like the prize this offseason. I'm still skeptical of Johnson and Waldron. 

I just don't even wanna hear about "bridge" QBs or trading for someone else's veteran QB.  It's like we've learned nothing.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, mav1234 said:

By leans I mean expects him to start etc. It just isn't happening dude.  He was a project, he looked terrible in preseason, and he's been out with an injury.  He'll have a shot in preseason, but nobody in their right mind goes into next season with him penciled in as a starter, unless the goal is somehow to tank. We don't know what of his college skills translated to the NFL because of how bad he was in preseason, how poorly he was handled, and the injury that prevents us from seeing him now.  

It doesn't matter if he's the only QB under contract next year... The new coach - or hell even Wilks - will bring in a vet AND likely draft someone in the first few rounds. 

Also given how atrocious this offense is I don't think it matters where he sat on McAdoos draft board, lol...

No basis for your argument. We will remain in the opposite spectrum if you think they're not going to play a QB they just drafted.

A project means you intend to do something, which is the opposite of what you're trying to cook.

Please stop it with the "preseason" stuff. He wasn't allowed to compete so much so dummy Matt Rhule was determined to coddle the guy to play Baker, Sam, PJ, to make his decisions look legit, and they weren't.

You have absolutely no idea how Corral looks behind NFL players. 0 idea, because you never saw it. Just wait before you hate.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I just don't even wanna hear about "bridge" QBs or trading for someone else's veteran QB.  It's like we've learned nothing.

Bridge QBs are fine if you also put the future on your roster behind them, and not just roll with them for one season with no backup plan for future development a-la Teddy. 

Signing a guy like Minshew, who is a proven backup at the very least, and playing him until the rookie is ready is a legitimately decent strategy in my opinion. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ricky Spanish said:

Bridge QBs are fine if you also put the future on your roster behind them, and not just roll with them for one season with no backup plan for future development a-la Teddy. 

Signing a guy like Minshew, who is a proven backup at the very least, and playing him until the rookie is ready is a legitimately decent strategy in my opinion. 

I'm fine with that, I just don't want us to sign Geno to a Teddy contract or trade for Jared Goff.  It should be someone who is cheap so the commitment level is low, and a FA so we don't have to give up anything.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I just don't even wanna hear about "bridge" QBs or trading for someone else's veteran QB.  It's like we've learned nothing.

True but it's also a decent strategy if there is a good plan in place. It all matters who is pitching it and Fritterer doesn't get the pass from me at this point. The rookie brought in would be key, IMO, more than the bridge QB who shouldn't be more than a short bridge. I still want to see any rookie starting by the end of the year regardless, good or bad get in there and show what you have been working on. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Bridge QBs are fine if you also put the future on your roster behind them, and not just roll with them for one season with no backup plan for future development a-la Teddy. 

Signing a guy like Minshew, who is a proven backup at the very least, and playing him until the rookie is ready is a legitimately decent strategy in my opinion. 

Yeah I agree.  Signing (not trading) for a solid vet while also drafting your QB is a solid plan moving forward.  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2022/12/07/carolina-panthers-anthony-richardson-2023-mock-draft/

Another good read.  Even mentions pairing him with the Eagles OC.  Goes through his highs (and lows) in college.

I am high on his potential.

He is still young, raw  but what he is capable of just can’t be taught 

the combine will help his draft status  rise 

there would be worse things to happen to this franchise then AR 

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

I am high on his potential.

He is still young, raw  but what he is capable of just can’t be taught 

the combine will help his draft status  rise 

there would be worse things to happen to this franchise then AR 

 

 

He'll be worse than Clausen 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...