Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Bucs GameDay Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

That was true for the first half.  The second half is when they couldn't do anything. 

Perhaps, but the reality is Brady hasn't been pressured much this year.  But most other teams actually covered the receivers.  I watched the Arizona game last week, and as bad as Arizona is, and as little pressure as they had on Brady for most of the game, I didn't see Evans running in almost a straight line down the field and blowing by the secondary multiple times.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Davidson Deac II said:

Perhaps, but the reality is Brady hasn't been pressured much this year.  But most other teams actually covered the receivers.  I watched the Arizona game last week, and as bad as Arizona is, and as little pressure as they had on Brady for most of the game, I didn't see Evans running in almost a straight line down the field and blowing by the secondary multiple times.  

Honestly, for most of this season Evans hasn't exactly been stellar, certainly not up to his previous standards.

That's one reason why the announcers talk so much about him being "back" yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Perhaps, but the reality is Brady hasn't been pressured much this year.  But most other teams actually covered the receivers.  I watched the Arizona game last week, and as bad as Arizona is, and as little pressure as they had on Brady for most of the game, I didn't see Evans running in almost a straight line down the field and blowing by the secondary multiple times.  

They weren't getting any pressure on Brady at all. He had all day to let Evans run straight down the field because we were letting them. It was just pitch and catch. Our secondary was paper thin before the injuries so I knew we were screwed going into this game.  But to not put a safety over the top on Evans is just incompetent. 

Edited by Jon Snow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doing a little Monday morning QB work today and was thinking...

 

After the first two TD passes why weren't our CB's instructed to just pass interfere Evans if he got by? Just push him outta bounds and take the flag. We held up in the red zone all day long, even blocked a damn field goal. If we take away the TD's on the long passes we could have turned 21 points into 13 or 17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/1/2023 at 1:57 PM, kungfoodude said:

I am not trying to jinx this but I don't see any way that offense mounts a comeback on that lead.

Looking back at this, you did jinx it.   LOL!

 

20 hours ago, frankw said:

True but Sam has a history of this foolishness we aren't going to coach it out of him.

Just so you know, this in regards to the fumble that happened involving him and Bozeman. 

Bozeman snapped it before Sam was ready and I blame him (Bozeman) for that.

 

But I blame Sam for not just falling on the loose ball instead of trying to pick it up. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Zaximus said:

Anyone excited to win a meaningless game next week to lose more draft spots like Panthers always do?

 

22 hours ago, matt rhules gut fat said:

Now let’s finish this right and beat the Saints for no reason than morale victory and further screwing up our draft and  keeping Wilks because “competitiveness and 7 wins”

Im sure the player picked before us will be elite but hey who cares right

Well good news you two 'cause apparently we can't do no worse than 9th. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Looking back at this, you did jinx it.   LOL!

 

Just so you know, this in regards to the fumble that happened involving him and Bozeman. 

Bozeman snapped it before Sam was ready and I blame him (Bozeman) for that.

 

But I blame Sam for not just falling on the loose ball instead of trying to pick it up. 

 

There were actually 3 fumbles he only recovered one. Even if you give him a pass for the one that's still two plus the interception. Just can't be that careless with the ball if you want to be in the postseason 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, frankw said:

There were actually 3 fumbles he only recovered one. Even if you give him a pass for the one that's still two plus the interception. Just can't be that careless with the ball if you want to be in the postseason 🤷‍♂️

Very true.

It is what it is.

So let's go draft a QB (or just give a Corral a shot), sign Darnold to a backup contract, draft a F*CKING TIGHT-END, and...oh....Hire a Coach who is more in-tune with Today's NFL. 

No more of these former DEFENSIVE Coordinators (or absolute frauds like Rhule) being put at Head Coach anymore.

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, frankw said:

There were actually 3 fumbles he only recovered one. Even if you give him a pass for the one that's still two plus the interception. Just can't be that careless with the ball if you want to be in the postseason 🤷‍♂️

I don't know what was going on with him and Bozeman that game.

I don't fault him for the Ickey sack-fumble.

I do for the INT.  Can't turn over the ball in games like that. He doesn't have control over the OL, but he does where / when / how he throws the ball, and he made the right read and the wrong throw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/2/2023 at 9:14 AM, Davidson Deac II said:

We sacked Brady as much or more than any other team has this year.  The secondary play was horrific.  

Sacking Brady as much as any team has this year isn't as significant as saving Brady or even getting pressure on him when we have too. And I agree that the secondary play should've been much better and changes should've been made. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...