Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Waldman's Breakdown of Anthony Richardson (QB, Florida)


Lemory
 Share

Recommended Posts

I came away from this feeling a lot better about Richardson at #9 overall. You hear from some NFL "experts" that Richardson needs time to sit and learn the game but this video shows he's ready to start from Day 1.

https://mattwaldmanrsp.com/2022/12/05/matt-waldmans-rsp-film-room-qb-anthony-richardson-florida-the-underrated-pocket-manager-and-field-general/

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Lemory said:

I came away from this feeling a lot better about Richardson at #9 overall. You hear from some NFL "experts" that Richardson needs time to sit and learn the game but this video shows he's ready to start from Day 1.

https://mattwaldmanrsp.com/2022/12/05/matt-waldmans-rsp-film-room-qb-anthony-richardson-florida-the-underrated-pocket-manager-and-field-general/

 

The throw at 13 seconds is fuging incredible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rebelrouser said:

Wow. I have yet to meet someone who regularly watches SEC ball who thinks AR does not suck. Starting him day 1 would be comical.  

I'm an Auburn fan living in Knoxville so I watch plenty of SEC football and I don't think AR sucks at all.  He is projected as a first round pick by many analysts as well.  I assume by your name you are just wanting Corral to have no competition next year which makes sense...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, rebelrouser said:

I will count you as the first. I am an Ole Miss fan, and I like Corral but doubt he ends up as a staring NFL qb, but we drafted him and should see what he has.  How are we going to get Corral and AR practice snaps next year?  

Florida fan here so you can accuse me of being a homer despite my take Trask shouldn’t have been drafted in the second round. I love Richardson, he’s a great kid, hard worker, will surprise folks in interviews and I think he’s better than his stats show. There’s plenty of folks here on this forum who have seen him play and watched how his WRs are trash and force him to try and play hero ball. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, rebelrouser said:

I will count you as the first. I am an Ole Miss fan, and I like Corral but doubt he ends up as a staring NFL qb, but we drafted him and should see what he has.  How are we going to get Corral and AR practice snaps next year?  

Unfortunately I don’t think Corral will hold much weight on decisions for our new staff. They won’t pass on a QB they like in fear of a previous coach’s 3rd round pick who found himself on IR all season. So Corral’s snap count will be irrelevant.
We should sign a vet like Brissett to pair with our rookie and Corral and honestly I wouldn’t be against letting the rookie play sooner vs later and just take his lumps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/9/2023 at 11:33 PM, Varking said:

Florida fan here so you can accuse me of being a homer despite my take Trask shouldn’t have been drafted in the second round. I love Richardson, he’s a great kid, hard worker, will surprise folks in interviews and I think he’s better than his stats show. There’s plenty of folks here on this forum who have seen him play and watched how his WRs are trash and force him to try and play hero ball. 

Yeah, there are so many variables that determine how a QB is "rated."  This video breakdown focuses on the things in the NFL that matter--his ability to navigate the pocket, read the defenses, turn his eyes away from the intended target to make his WR get open. 

Our WRs were not really getting open last year.  This could be what the Dr. Ordered.  I am intrigued and will watch more film on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Yeah, there are so many variables that determine how a QB is "rated."  This video breakdown focuses on the things in the NFL that matter--his ability to navigate the pocket, read the defenses, turn his eyes away from the intended target to make his WR get open. 

Our WRs were not really getting open last year.  This could be what the Dr. Ordered.  I am intrigued and will watch more film on him.

If you just watch his highlights you wonder why in the hell isnt he walking away with the #1 pick but then if you watch everything you wonder why in the hell is he coming out.

 

That said I hope we pick him at #9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/13/2023 at 9:28 AM, mrcompletely11 said:

If you just watch his highlights you wonder why in the hell isnt he walking away with the #1 pick but then if you watch everything you wonder why in the hell is he coming out.

 

That said I hope we pick him at #9

Im kind of getting excited about him as well. That said, is #9 to high, is there an option to trade back and still get him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

is there an option to trade back and still get him?

The best candidates for a trade back would be qb needy teams so probably not. We certainly couldn't comfortably trade back behind the jets. It's interesting in that Atlanta, Carolina, and Tennessee all decided to take their preferred qb last year.  However, everyone assumes only Carolina wants to take another q

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Panthers Huddle is usually just propaganda …this one was actually good im feeling good about the Morgan and Canales marriage  the proof is ‘in the pudding’ however  …and have to remember a first time head coach and players who have never played together before but they can’t possibly be worse than last year  the wild card to all this,  too,  is Young  I wish I felt better about him but I don’t  Morgan says he wants ‘dawgs’ not ‘dogs’ I.e. pit bulls vs poodles…I see young as the latter, not the former  Regardless, life is full of surprises…maybe he is a lot more than I see.  I’m not a scout or coach 
    • There are a lot of moving parts to this type of questions and way too many variables to consider to really predict how the outcome would have been any different in 2023 with Dalton starting more than just one game.  But instead of focusing on that Seattle game, another game, and the game following it, are more intriguing to me.   Week 16 vs Green Bay.  Young had the best game of his rookie season.  23/36 (64%) for 312 with 2 TD and no INT.  Thielen (6/94), Chark (6/98) and Tremble (4/59) all had huge plays in the passing game. The running game was a different story.  Hubbard (16/43) and Sanders (3/3) combined for just 46 yards rushing.  Mays was starting at LG and Jensen at RG.  The offensive line was able to protect Young just enough to keep the Panthers in the game until the very end.  But this wasn't because they were playing at a high level, rather the Packers defense played horrible this game. But this horrible defensive effort by the Packers allowed us to see what could be possible if Young had time to process and throw. Fast forward to Week 17 vs Jacksonville.  The offense was shut out and the offensive line allowed 6 sacks and 8 more QH's.   If you go back and watch these games back to back, the line play if very noticeable.  When Young had time in process and move, he was spot on.  When the line collapsed, like most QBs, he was ineffective. When you draft a QB 1st overall in the draft, especially if you trade up to do so, you hope to get a QB that can make plays despite the struggles around him.  Think Newton his rookie year.  Should the Panthers have traded up in the 2023 draft to the 1st overall and should they have drafted Young at that spot? My opinion is no to the first question and no QB in 2023 was worth trading up to take in the top 10.  Neither Stroud, Richardson or Levis would have been worth it.   But none of them would have fared any better than Young either with the Panthers, in my opinion.  Stroud had a good season in Houston but he didn't have a Cam Newton or Lamar Jackson season.  He needed slightly above average talent in one of the worst divisions to make the playoffs. He had the season we were hoping for in Carolina but wasn't going to get with Young or Stroud. Now, I'm not trying to put Young up on a pedestal here.  There are a lot of questions that still surround him and his ability to be QB1 on the Panthers in the future.  But the issue last year wasn't just the play at the QB position.  And really, I don't think the WR issues were as much as people make them out to be.  The real issue on this offense was the line and the running game.  If your line can't get a push to run the ball or pass block to pass the ball, you have no offense.   Start Young. Start Dalton.  Draft Stroud, Richardson or Levis.  Kidnap Mahomes.  Doesn't matter, I think the end result would have been the same. 
    • If there’s any year to be aggressive with it, it’s this one.
×
×
  • Create New...