Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

HC Candidate List


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I know people didn't want us to interview him, but Dan Quinn knows how to call a defense.

It is the same thing as Sean Payton, Mr. Scot. Ex rivalries are hard to let go. I have no doubt that both Quinn and Payton would have this team competing much faster than any rookie HC.

Edited by philit99
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's too big a job for one man. That's why there are so few of them anymore.

Hell, we just spent three years under a full control coach.

I get it, difference is, Rhule is a crap coach Payton is not. Not saying I’m advocating for Payton, but comparing this to Rhule seems odd to me. Payton has at least shown he can do it, heck, why not let him have it. It’s gotta be better that what we’ve seen for quite some time. Even going back to the Hurney days. Have we ever really had a good GM? Have we ever really had a coach of Payton’s caliber? 
 

On the flip side, if he messes up we are screwed. Gets to big headed…we are screwed. Anyway, thanks for your input, I’ve seen a lot of users say they don’t want a coach with full control but never say why. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

I get it, difference is, Rhule is a crap coach Payton is not. Not saying I’m advocating for Payton, but comparing this to Rhule seems odd to me. Payton has at least shown he can do it, heck, why not let him have it. It’s gotta be better that what we’ve seen for quite some time. Even going back to the Hurney days. Have we ever really had a good GM? Have we ever really had a coach of Payton’s caliber? 

On the flip side, if he messes up we are screwed. Gets to big headed…we are screwed. Anyway, thanks for your input, I’ve seen a lot of users say they don’t want a coach with full control but never say why. 

I've hated that model since long before Rhule, honestly. Any one guy going unchecked can go really wrong, really fast.

Tepper has stated after the Rhule experience,  he wouldn't have a full control head coach again. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Is he still scheduled to sit with us tomorrow? I want to see what the real demands are and not all of these reports. 

That kind of information almost never becomes public. We didn't even know the true dynamic between Fitts and Rhule for a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...