Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yes please


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

From 12 to 3 cost 3 1sts. No way 9 to 1 goes for less than that. 

hard to guess.  Every year is different and just because one team is really stupid doesn't mean it continues a trend.  Draft chart was thrown out the window I believe with Trey Lance. 

That's like saying every team can get 2nd, 4th and 6th for whenever they develop and produce the worst QB in the NFL just because the Panthers did it. 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly wouldn't mind this at all but alas this is too cheap for a team like the bears to accept. They will most likely want a second instead of the third this year along with the future third becoming a second also. That still would be fine as long as we get a hell of a motherfuging QB for this.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CRA said:

hard to guess.  Every year is different and just because one team is really stupid doesn't mean it continues a trend.  Draft chart was thrown out the window I believe with Trey Lance. 

That's like saying every team can get 2nd, 4th and 6th for whenever they develop and produce the worst QB in the NFL just because the Panthers did it. 

That trade was also for the 3rd ranked QB in that draft. It's everyone's guess really what it's going to cost, but with so many QB needy teams, I could easily see Indy matching that identical offer and Chicago would take it because it it would only drop them 3 positions. 

The reason the Jets got what they did for Darnold is Rhule played his cards with T2G way too early. He tried to play poker with his cards face up and we got taken to the cleaners. Going into a trade negotiation desperate is never going to work out for you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found it previous years, I can't find a trade chart that shows the value of future picks.

Bears 1st is - 3000 points

Our first, 3rd, and 4th - is just 1546 points 

Just applying mid round value (16th) to the 2023 1st and 3rd doesn't get you to 3000

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Logically yes. Boston has the right balance though. Jalen Brown is #2 in the paint and their best shooters are 17th and 19th. While our best shooters are #1 and #2 and we have one player in the top 50 for points in the paint. And my understanding looking at the information I just referenced is we were basically at the exact same paint percentage last year in Charles Lee's offense. At the end of the day we either want to compete for a playoff series winner and the finals or we just want to stumble our way to another play in. We've already done that with James Borrego.
    • We need more bigs.  I love Moose, but him coming off the bench would be ideal. Even Kalkbrenner slowed down  Duren/Stewart from my eyes.   Draft someone like 7’3 Center from Michigan Aday Mara. We have plenty of talent, we need size. I really want Yaxel and one of Mara/ Quaintance.
    • We don't need another first round WR to evaluate Bryce Young. You could give him a young Jerry Rice Randy Moss and Justin Jefferson and he would still struggle to lead the group to a top 20 passing offense because he simply cannot utilize the entire field consistently. All we're going to end up with by drafting another first round wide receiver is a disgruntled WR room. Because one there are not that many touches to go around and two the touches that will be available maybe half of them will result in good to great ball placement. And the bulk of them will be thrown at or behind the line of scrimmage. If the FO goes WR at 19 all involved might as well go ahead and start looking at other job opportunities down the line.
×
×
  • Create New...