Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We’re trading for #1 pick !!!


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Bears MB saying that we were trying to offer 3 1sts but they wanted Moore. Not sure how much of that is true. 

Given the source alone I'd probably call bullsh-t, but that story doesn't make a lot of sense.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

I feel like the trade should've been good enough with just the picks.  Not thrilled about the cost, but excited to see what we do at #1.  And I'll miss DJ.  I hope he flourishes with Fields.

And yet, I also feel like I'm surprised we only gave up two firsts if that makes any sense.

Technically only one first since this year's is a swap.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

Damn Bears give up 1 top pick and get a superstar WR, another top pick next year and more picks 

Superstar? What the?? Never once has a DC ever been worried about gam planning against DJ. He’s good but dude never took over or was a true difference maker. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, I’m not gonna act like an armchair expert, been lurking here forever and love this board.  All I know is we have an experienced staff that is looking to create a new culture and get the Panthers back to being relevant on Sundays. 
Could be the worst trade ever, could be franchise positive for years to come. Honestly just stoked to see where it goes. I think DJ is gonna do great things in Chicago, hate seeing him go, but we had to do something to fix the QB situation.  Good or bad, no matter what your stance is on what we gave up, you gotta admit it’s great to control the narrative at this point. 
 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WarmThunder said:

Look, I’m not gonna act like an armchair expert, been lurking here forever and love this board.  All I know is we have an experienced staff that is looking to create a new culture and get the Panthers back to being relevant on Sundays. 
Could be the worst trade ever, could be franchise positive for years to come. Honestly just stoked to see where it goes. I think DJ is gonna do great things in Chicago, hate seeing him go, but we had to do something to fix the QB situation.  Good or bad, no matter what your stance is on what we gave up, you gotta admit it’s great to control the narrative at this point. 
 

 

No...its a bad trade and not  spinnable to trick our sensibilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Brugler mentioned Reich liking him.

(really liking him, in fact)

My view hasn't changed. I'm good with whoever we decide on because I trust the guys making the decision.

I agree as long as it’s someone from the staff, if they like Levis then I’m on board though I do prefer Stroud. But I don’t want the team selecting players because our owner wants to play real life Madden.

We have a great staff and I trust them to get us back to where we need to be as long as Tepper lets them do their job.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Reebis21 said:

Superstar? What the?? Never once has a DC ever been worried about gam planning against DJ. He’s good but dude never took over or was a true difference maker. 

100%. He was good but nothing like a steve Smith or some true game changer. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...