Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers cut C Pat Elfein

Saca312

By Saca312,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

Outside of having to give up DJ (which definitely hurts), I can't imagine this offseason going any better.

It's nice to have professionals running the show on Mint Street

smart valued moves thus far in both bell and especially boze.

I dont know enough on tuttle. Did see some highlights, he was playing NT and holding his own. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

Outside of having to give up DJ (which definitely hurts), I can't imagine this offseason going any better.

It's nice to have professionals running the show on Mint Street

I'm not gonna celebrate just yet. We still have to nail this pick and find some guys for this kid to throw to.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, grimesgoat said:

I think you need to net it against guys that they will replace.  probably closer to 7m for rookies.

panthers got the 1st overall, its the highest number and 39th isnt that cheap either.... i think sportac has the real numbers brb--------

2059820896_Screenshot2023-03-145_06_06PM.thumb.png.de6a96ccf4400f8d6865f956ef2c2f57.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
grimesgoat Experienced

grimesgoat

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

panthers got the 1st overall, its the highest number and 39th isnt that cheap either.... i think sportac has the real numbers brb--------

2059820896_Screenshot2023-03-145_06_06PM.thumb.png.de6a96ccf4400f8d6865f956ef2c2f57.png

yep.  and those six players will replace 6 players currently counting in the active 51.  The guys they replace are all probably bottom of the roster guys making about 900k.  900k x 6 = 5.4m.  12.6m - 5.4m = 7.2m

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, grimesgoat said:

yep.  and those six players will replace 6 players currently counting in the active 51.  The guys they replace are all probably bottom of the roster guys making about 900k.  900k x 6 = 5.4m.  12.6m - 5.4m = 7.2m

We will not know until the draft happen, but I think youre still off. the top 51 is right next to draft one. 

most times those around 47-55 all have the same UDFA level pay. most times its doesnt effect the top 51 much. But add the #1 guaranteed draft pick will. Finessererer could trade around a few times too, i dont know if they keep the 39th or others. late 5th -7th are normally at the 51 cut off. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...