Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sanders? Just help me understand.

SmittysLawnGuy

By SmittysLawnGuy,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

SmittysLawnGuy Veteran

SmittysLawnGuy

Posted
Posted

Hope this wasn't to appease Duce. I'm not knocking anything. Have loved the teams moves. This one leaves me a bit perplexed. We had Hammer n nails (or tacks) if that's how you consider Mrs. Rhules boy. I hated him out of college n year one. Guy showed something this past year. Is Sanders worth 6 times his value even if we lose the Hammer (Foreman). I'm not seeing it n don't even throw in what if we land Foreman too, were still talking 6x the value, I don't dislike the guy. Watch the highlights, looks a lot like Hubbard. Chark would be on my team to cut our slow azz receiving core. We can't make rb a luxury. Flame on.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tr3ach Grand Master

Tr3ach

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Hope this wasn't to appease Duce. I'm not knocking anything. Have loved the teams moves. This one leaves me a bit perplexed. We had Hammer n nails (or tacks) if that's how you consider Mrs. Rhules boy. I hated him out of college n year one. Guy showed something this past year. Is Sanders worth 6 times his value even if we lose the Hammer (Foreman). I'm not seeing it n don't even throw in what if we land Foreman too, were still talking 6x the value, I don't dislike the guy. Watch the highlights, looks a lot like Hubbard. Chark would be on my team to cut our slow azz receiving core. We can't make rb a luxury. Flame on.

New system needs rbs that are dual threat.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmittysLawnGuy Veteran

SmittysLawnGuy

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Foreman signed a 1 year $3 million deal after several days of FA. The league sets its values on players. Our OL helped him look great. Sanders is a 3 down back who also has good hands. He is like a Saquan-lite with less injuries.

Problem is we had that for millions less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Clicheking
      Day 2 Targets/Faves

      By Clicheking · Posted

      Give me Anthony Hill Jr or give me death
    • ProcessBlue2
      Mike Kaye predicting we trade up in 2nd round

      By ProcessBlue2 · Posted

      We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • woahfraze
      Day 2 Targets/Faves

      By woahfraze · Posted

      There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
×
×
  • Create New...