Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sanders? Just help me understand.


SmittysLawnGuy
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

If we offered Foreman a multi year deal it was clearly less than 3 a year which he wasn't happy with. Oh well. Foreman had an offer on the table well before Miles Sanders became a Panther

I think he's actually saying that he'd prefer Hubbard to Sanders

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Every year we win the off-season in our fans eyes, we literally lose everyone, am I not allowed to question one move with out being considered a moron.

I don’t think this is playing out the way you think it is.  It appears in this thread you have asked a question about sanders vs foreman and people have given you an answer but you are disagreeing with them and/or being borderline disrespectful.

 

that’s the core issue here. Why ask a question if you aren’t going to agree with the answer?

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Every year we win the off-season in our fans eyes, we literally lose everyone, am I not allowed to question one move with out being considered a moron.

You do have the right to question but there are gonna be rebukes...I'm not gonna lie I am biased because I had Sanders pegged as a target the moment FA season hit.

Edited by Panthercougar68
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Every year we win the off-season in our fans eyes, we literally lose everyone, am I not allowed to question one move with out being considered a moron.

You literally said “Flame on.” What did you expect? Also, nobody was really even flaming but you got bent out of shape real quick I don’t even know why. The first person to call somebody a moron was, in fact, you. You started this thread defensive and just gone down hill from there.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I don’t think this is playing out the way you think it is.  It appears in this thread you have asked a question about sanders vs foreman and people have given you an answer but you are disagreeing with them and/or being borderline disrespectful.

 

that’s the core issue here. Why ask a question if you aren’t going to agree with the answer?

Haven't got a good answer yet . Watch Foreman n Hubbard last year. This dude does not have that at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WUnderhill said:

You literally said “Flame on.” What did you expect? Also, nobody was really even flaming but you got bent out of shape real quick I don’t even know why. The first person to call somebody a moron was, in fact, you. You started this thread defensive and just gone down hill from there.

Touche.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't say I'm a HUGE fan of it, but I understand the rationale as he's a complete back that catches out of the backfield and will probably be our rookie QB's safety valve. Also, it's not that bad of a contract - it's really a 2-year deal and then the Panthers can move on without too much of a hit, if necessary. There's no guaranteed salary after the 2024 season, so cutting him out right would leave just under $3m of dead money and free up just over $5m of cap space. We'd just be on the hook for the remaining prorated signing bonus: https://overthecap.com/player/miles-sanders/7844

Edited by UNCrules2187
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know people are struggling with this. It's really what teams.want out of theirnstarting running back. They want a running back whom can play ever down, and catch out of the backfield. 

Sanders is a lot like CMC, but without CMC's price.  Consider him a value. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Lol. The Texans are literally one of Bryce's six career NFL wins. WTF are you talking about?
    • Yeah, I mean it is a statistical fact and also part of literally a player evaluation. Winston has literally lost dozens of games in his NFL career due to crippling TO's. It's just who he is. Look, it's fun when those insane throws work and he is leading you back from some crazy deficit. But those success are rare. It's why his career GWD count is so low. He's fun but he is fundamentally built to lose games.  If you are talking about a backup QB, you are literally already losing in the first place. That's how you see a backup QB and that's overwhelmingly what they tend to do. Rookie QB's almost always benefit from veteran QB's. Same as literally any other position in the NFL. Why do you think that you so often hear that from the playera themselves? As for Bryce NEEDING one, no he sure as poo shouldn't this late in the game. But he also shouldn't have needed this fuging long to get his fuging footwork straightened out either. Yet here we are.
    • Comfortability is the primary reason. They don't want to hurt Bryce's confidence. But I say if his confidence is that fragile that healthy competition which makes everyone better is enough for them to keep making Andy Dalton rich then Bryce was never going to be the guy anyway. Give me the QB who sees the competition amongst his peers and uses it to take it to the next level. Instead we get the guy who comes out looking like a deer in the headlights against the Texans after we've done everything possible to appease him. Definition of complacency.
×
×
  • Create New...