Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers still have $23.5M in cap space

neverlosethefeeling
 Share

Recommended Posts

Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

For job security.  His cap numbers the next two years are such that we won't cut him.

And we shouldn't cut him. He's going to be instrumental to this defense, particularly in the transition to a 3-4 set up. He's a smart player and has a better grasp of how plays develop and where everyone needs to be than just about anyone in the league right now --- we'd recognize that more if we hadn't been spoiled over the years by Luke Kuechly. 

Shaq's going to shine this coming year. 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

They have us at 90 million in space for 2024

That doesn’t include:

Burns extension 

Brown 5th year option 

Jeremy Chinn will be a FA

Frankie Luvu will be a FA 


I’m sure they restructure Moton again next season 

I thought a Burns extension would be one of the first orders of business this offseason considering how much cap space it frees up.  That and Shaq's reworked deal. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted
Just now, 45catfan said:

I thought a Burns extension would be one of the first orders of business this offseason considering how much cap space it frees up.  That and Shaq's reworked deal. 

Same but now that we are switching to a 3-4 maybe Burns wants to play this year out first 

Potential for him to get those sack numbers up/bigger payday 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Same but now that we are switching to a 3-4 maybe Burns wants to play this year out first 

Potential for him to get those sack numbers up/bigger payday 

It may also be a good investment for us to  let him play out the tag. There is a chance that he might underperform in the 3-4 and it would be better to not be tied to a multi-year deal for heavy bucks when the player can't live up to it. 

I don't think Burns will underperform, I think he will thrive, but we've seen it happen before when the big contract gets put into place. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smithers Grand Master

Smithers

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

They have us at 90 million in space for 2024

That doesn’t include:

Burns extension 

Brown 5th year option 

Jeremy Chinn will be a FA

Frankie Luvu will be a FA 


I’m sure they restructure Moton again next season 

We easily add 10M to that by cutting Jackson 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Monday practice tweets

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      Jones got projected as the next Eli because they share a similar goofball, on the spectrum energy.  That's my theory.
    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      I didn't think underrated was the wildest statement. The passing and offensive command he showed in week 18 against Atlanta was as good as any QB that has ever played for this franchise.  I mean THAT part is wild.  Which plays into the overrated part.  End of regulation I don't think he even hit 200 yards passing.  I mean he had a very efficient day vs a weak defense.   As good as we have ever seen in Carolina?   
×
×
  • Create New...