Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers still have $23.5M in cap space


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

For job security.  His cap numbers the next two years are such that we won't cut him.

And we shouldn't cut him. He's going to be instrumental to this defense, particularly in the transition to a 3-4 set up. He's a smart player and has a better grasp of how plays develop and where everyone needs to be than just about anyone in the league right now --- we'd recognize that more if we hadn't been spoiled over the years by Luke Kuechly. 

Shaq's going to shine this coming year. 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

They have us at 90 million in space for 2024

That doesn’t include:

Burns extension 

Brown 5th year option 

Jeremy Chinn will be a FA

Frankie Luvu will be a FA 


I’m sure they restructure Moton again next season 

I thought a Burns extension would be one of the first orders of business this offseason considering how much cap space it frees up.  That and Shaq's reworked deal. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 45catfan said:

I thought a Burns extension would be one of the first orders of business this offseason considering how much cap space it frees up.  That and Shaq's reworked deal. 

Same but now that we are switching to a 3-4 maybe Burns wants to play this year out first 

Potential for him to get those sack numbers up/bigger payday 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Same but now that we are switching to a 3-4 maybe Burns wants to play this year out first 

Potential for him to get those sack numbers up/bigger payday 

It may also be a good investment for us to  let him play out the tag. There is a chance that he might underperform in the 3-4 and it would be better to not be tied to a multi-year deal for heavy bucks when the player can't live up to it. 

I don't think Burns will underperform, I think he will thrive, but we've seen it happen before when the big contract gets put into place. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

They have us at 90 million in space for 2024

That doesn’t include:

Burns extension 

Brown 5th year option 

Jeremy Chinn will be a FA

Frankie Luvu will be a FA 


I’m sure they restructure Moton again next season 

We easily add 10M to that by cutting Jackson 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How many elite QBs do we have right now in the league? And how elite are they, really? Mahomes - I seriously doubt anyone would say otherwise. My only counterpoint is that since Tyreek left, he has not been as explosive. Only one with a ring. Allen - Yes. His first year was rough, however, and even now, he's a turnover machine which has cost his team games. Wouldn't surprise me if he regresses as talent around him goes elsewhere. Burrow - Can say he got to a Super Bowl but injuries may be a concern. All those sacks he took may be coming back to bite the Bengals. Jackson/Prescott - Can't win in the playoffs even with rosters around them, so no. So there you go. At least in my eyes, there's only maybe 3 right now. And over the past 10 years, QBs not Mahomes/Brady that have won were (noodle arm) Manning, Nick Foles and Matthew Stafford. Even Stafford I'd argue was a one-shot because the Rams absolutely went all-in with talent. 
    • Without Guentzel, the team has a better chance of being able to keep Jarvy long term, Noesen for another 2-3 years, Drury and Turbo maybe. And I'm saying that because I think Jarvis will make us forget about Guentzel.
×
×
  • Create New...