Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thomas Davis - Not so fast my friend!


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Heck yea, let’s sit back and enjoy the ride, poo like this for this team doesn’t happen often. We finally have competent coaches and a GM with the reigns off, let’s let this play out.  

Most definitely  bro!!! I can honestly  say I'm good with whichever  route they go!! We haven't had this many component  offensive  minds on a staff ever. I truly believe  they will be beneficial  to any of the Qbs being mentioned!!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Huddler said:

I believe in Reich and our evaluators and I stand by any pick they make. 

 

 

Who says Reich is doing whatever he wants? 

We don’t know if the buck stops at Reich.   Was he the final say in wanting to trade up to #1, give up next years first and his best offensive player? For a pick he would figure out? 

I still think the Watson pursuit was Tepper.  Think there are decent odds the move up was him wanting to make a splash after his most recent trainwreck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Imagine using Undisputed as your voice of reason. Those dudes talk more about off the field antics than actual football.smh

 

 

I know they are clowns but to dismiss the points made does not make sense. The tape does not lie. Combine results do not change how you scout these QB’s and AR will not be the pick. No way what TD said comes true, the staff is not that dumb. CJ and Young are on another level of QB and they will not risk their job by drafting AR number one overall. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People worried about Bryce Young getting his career shortened by injuries.  There has never been a running QB that didn’t get injured and have his career cut short.  Including Lamar Jackson who has like zero suitors for a huge contract.

Picking him at #1 would be insane 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Who says Reich is doing whatever he wants? 

We don’t know if the buck stops at Reich.   Was he the final say in wanting to trade up to #1, give up next years first and his best offensive player? For a pick he would figure out? 

I still think the Watson pursuit was Tepper.  Think there are decent odds the move up was him wanting to make a splash after his most recent trainwreck. 

i think the Watson thing was Rhules last ditch effort at staying

 

"gimme gimme gimme" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

Who says Reich is doing whatever he wants? 

We don’t know if the buck stops at Reich.   Was he the final say in wanting to trade up to #1, give up next years first and his best offensive player? For a pick he would figure out? 

I still think the Watson pursuit was Tepper.  Think there are decent odds the move up was him wanting to make a splash after his most recent trainwreck. 

We actually do.

Final say belongs to Fitterer. That's confirmed. But he and Reich genuinely seem to have an excellent working relationship.

I expect they'll come to a collective decision. That part I don't doubt.

 Just hope it's the right one...

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

i think the Watson thing was Rhules last ditch effort at staying

 

"gimme gimme gimme" 

I think that runs counter to what Rhule always said he was doing here from day 1 until his firing…..and what Tepper himself has said about what and when it’s his time be involved.  

Watson, the scandal and the package to get him….no way that was Rhule.   That’s Tepper.  Tepper said that’s when he comes in.  I would say CMC, trading up for #1, and what we are presently doing….heavy Tepper involvement.   Those are the type scenarios he said he would be heavily in. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Lurk21 said:

Most definitely  bro!!! I can honestly  say I'm good with whichever  route they go!! We haven't had this many component  offensive  minds on a staff ever. I truly believe  they will be beneficial  to any of the Qbs being mentioned!!

Absolutely, it’s like Fitt said, you don’t trade up for a guy unless you conviction for them, if they are truly dead set on AR, so be it. Like you, I’m good with whoever, except levis lol 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Lobo said:

Absolutely, it’s like Fitt said, you don’t trade up for a guy unless you conviction for them, if they are truly dead set on AR, so be it. Like you, I’m good with whoever, except levis lol 

I concur lol #notoLevis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • this will always be his issue. Because of either bad footwork or lack of arm strength he lofts those deeper balls. thats why he doesnt really attack the middle of the field. you cant float those passes there or its a pick. a lot of time those deep passes, wr had to slow down to catch it. you cant have an offense where you dont attack the middle of the field. 
    • Well that’s the thing. Inconsistent. He will be horrible and then an hour later play much better.  In his third season, he finally played well for 4 qtrs a couple of times. You could look at a drive from those games and be a believer.  But keep watching…. you are like, that was a mirage. 
    • That line about ‘above expectation’… the whole thing is so subjective. And unquantifiable due to the nature of it. Endless variables when the grader needs to make almost a split second determination of what the expectation should even be.  They try, I know. I can even give them the benefit of assuming good faith.  But that is so subjective and the name they gave it is pure hype. What about it is big time? Granted some throws are great but a plus one throw n September doesn’t seem to automatically deserve the label big time.     Would look to rename it with less hyperbolic label. That is my biggest objection really.    Big time were the throws on 4th down in the last qtr vs the Rams. Those, all day long. Excellent and for sure under big time pressure. Some other throws too. But that kind of throw seems to be a smaller fraction of what they use to calculate their grade. 
×
×
  • Create New...