Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young Pro Day


ForJimmy
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Two things confirmed for me:

1) Bryce Young is a great passer of the football

2) His receivers were pretty trash this year

Burton is garbage. Even Gibbs, as talented as he is, looked to bust his nose on a pass right through his hands. 

Glad to see somebody eyes working properly in here

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stan786 said:

Pretty low key Pro Day, enjoyed how Bryce managed the calls and his receivers the whole day.

Basically perfect Mid and Short range

Didnt connect with Burton on 2-3 deep balls but 2 should have been caught and the third was a really nice ball imo.

Hit the net on the roof on what would have been the most interesting throw of the day.

Thought he had nice velocity on most his throws and the did a lot to simulate defenders in his face, I really enjoyed a number of beautiful throws he made about 15-20 yards deep toward the sideline.

Definitely no real fireworks and the deep balls will be debated (thought they showed what they needed to) but overall it was a low key businessman like affair. 
 

Did some under center stuff, PA stuff, Shotgun, etc, felt like a checklist.

Accurate breakdown. Good stuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Psssh 

while you complain that Young didn’t throw a ball 10 inches shorter 50+ yards downfield. 
 

Burton dropped the first one right over his shoulder. Then looked like he gave up on his next couple deep balls bc he didn’t want it to happen again. 

"Guys, guys ... Young had the WORST WRs in the history of organized football today, and don't GET me started on this past season for Bama. Had Young had better WRs, he would've broken every passing record in NCAA history! And his O-Line ... OMG ... straight traaaaash. MEANWHILE, guys ... guys, Stroud had like ... the best WRs we've ever seen since like the football became a thing at his pro-day, and during the season his O-Line and WRs were SO good they could've replaced like, any NFL O-Line and WR."

Never change, somepeopleonthehuddle. This place gives some QBs more excuses than .... well ... there is no comparison. The Huddle treats some of their QBs with kid gloves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

"Guys, guys ... Young had the WORST WRs in the history of organized football today, and don't GET me started on this past season for Bama. Had Young had better WRs, he would've broken every passing record in NCAA history! And his O-Line ... OMG ... straight traaaaash. MEANWHILE, guys ... guys, Stroud had like ... the best WRs we've ever seen since like the football became a thing at his pro-day, and during the season his O-Line and WRs were SO good they could've replaced like, any NFL O-Line and WR."

Never change, somepeopleonthehuddle. This place gives some QBs more excuses than .... well ... there is no comparison. The Huddle treats some of their QBs with kid gloves.

Stroud is the best QB in this class. I think Levis is second. Levis 2022 was horrid because his best receiver was a true freshman, he had a new offensive coordinator, and his line was garbage.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

"Guys, guys ... Young had the WORST WRs in the history of organized football today, and don't GET me started on this past season for Bama. Had Young had better WRs, he would've broken every passing record in NCAA history! And his O-Line ... OMG ... straight traaaaash. MEANWHILE, guys ... guys, Stroud had like ... the best WRs we've ever seen since like the football became a thing at his pro-day, and during the season his O-Line and WRs were SO good they could've replaced like, any NFL O-Line and WR."

Never change, somepeopleonthehuddle. This place gives some QBs more excuses than .... well ... there is no comparison. The Huddle treats some of their QBs with kid gloves.

You didn’t watch him throw. Clearly. 
 

The poster was misleading with his description of Bryce’s throws. A couple were outright drops and two others hit the roof. That equates to Bryce struggled with the deep ball?? lol no and do better 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...