Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Moneyball is here


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

none of these deals will become crippling, thats a key point. Most are of the two year easy 3rd year out type too. 

 

None are Charles Johnson 5 year 72 million either.

 

Shaq took a pay cut.

 

Boz was the best signing in the whole NFL. 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 7
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Varking said:

It’s not next level analytics lol. There aren’t game breaker offensive players on the market worth spending the money on. 

That’s what analytics is about finding value where others see a JAG. Time will tell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's also something to be said for *not* having a true #1 WR imho. You've still got to have some talented guys, but I think an offense is more dangerous when the distribution is very diverse. Things are less predictable and it makes it more challenging for defenses to key in on favored targets when the ball could go anywhere on any play without that traditional focal point. Of course you've got to have a QB with a quick processor and an accurate arm. Hmm...

  • Pie 7
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, UnluckyforSome said:

Isn't he awful in everything?

This is actually when he was good, his peak was Wolfe of Wall Street. Been down Hill (pun intended) since he lost weight and adopted his weird fashion style

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RJK said:

Other than Superbad and wolf of Wall Street, yes. 

What about that gun runner movie, he was ok in it. 

Ive never seen wall street, i heard he took that film for like 25k in order to just be a part of it (leo&martin)

jump street 21/22 he wasnt too bad. 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • i am anxious to see what he does with this new situation. i think the schedule is about as favorable as you could hope for the first half of the year. i don't expect a dramatic and quick  improvement, but i do expect improvement.
    • truthfully, when did he have time last year to throw it down field? plays took far too long to develop and the OL gave him no time.  i think we are basing far too much of bryce's assessment on a situation that didn't work out in his favor at all. it was probably the worst situation a rookie QB could have found himself in. the only i can think of who had it worse was David Carr, who had an even worse rookie season than Bryce by a significant margin statistically.  i think most would realize that carr was probably a better QB than his record would show, but he was shell shocked in his first few years because they did nothing to try to help him out. 3 of his 5 years in houston he led the league in sacks. i don't think he would ever have been an elite QB, but had he been in a better situation he probably would have had a better and longer career. point is, i don't think we saw everything that bryce is capable of because he was limited by the situation. but i understand the pessimism most have, because all we really have to go on was what we saw last year. that's why i wait to see what happens with a better situation. i just don't think you can give an accurate assessment of him based on last year. it wouldn't be fair for any rookie, tbh, but for one whos situation was so fugged up i think it's even more unfair. had nothing changed in the situation, you could probably expect more of the same. that's just not the case, though. a whole lot changed for the team and for his situation and i think for the better. it just makes sense that if we improved the situation that he will improve. 
×
×
  • Create New...