Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Betting odds have shifted


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, ickmule said:

All of that does not make Him a winning head coach. I give no one credit or praise until they earn it. It’s only my opinion, but selecting Young will prove an error in judgment.  

Man you sure are talking like you’ve been to the future and seen that Bryce is a bust lol. 
 

All the QB’s can either bust or be successful, there’s no definite way of knowing so I’m not sure why you’re so certain that if Bryce is the pick it’ll be such a big mistake. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

Throwing a pretty ball is definitely a positive for qbs, but far from the #1 trait.  Heck, some of the strongest armed prettiest ball throwing prospects have been the biggest busts in recent memory.

Both Mannings threw ugly footballs.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Wolfcop said:

All you Youngsters may get your way. I hope you don’t regret it a few years from now. Many analysts believe that Stroud is a better fit for the Panthers and has a higher ceiling, even those who think Young is better right now. We will see. I think we will all be pulling for whomever gets picked and hope he is an All-Pro. 

Not any fans ways, it's the choice of the front office.  I don't think anyone is going to freak out with either QB. 

THEN AGAIN, the huddle will huddle and bitch about stupid poo regardless of how irrelevant it is. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BlackPanther22 said:

Man you sure are talking like you’ve been to the future and seen that Bryce is a bust lol. 
 

All the QB’s can either bust or be successful, there’s no definite way of knowing so I’m not sure why you’re so certain that if Bryce is the pick it’ll be such a big mistake. 

Small and short.  THATS WHY. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, MHS831 said:

 I heard that if Houston cannot get Young, they might trade out or take Anderson.  If that is true, I see them possibly making a substantial offer to the Panthers.  A few weeks ago, I thought it was silly to suggest such a trade since (in my mind) there were 2 elite QBs. As we get closer, it seems that there is Young and Stroud is on a lower level.

Would you take the 2024 Houston first rounder to swap with Houston?  (I know what the Stroud supporters would say, and I was one in the beginning and still like him--I think I would take that deal)

Since I am a Stroud fan, even though I also like Young  a lot, I would take that trade if I were the Panthers in a heart beat and never once look back.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KatsAzz said:

Since I am a Stroud fan, even though I also like Young  a lot, I would take that trade if I were the Panthers in a heart beat and never once look back.

Me too. If I were the Panthers, I would ask for #2 and #12 this year.  Reading tea leaves:  That could be why they brought in Joey Porter Jr. for a visit.   Can you imagine getting Stroud and a stud CB?  It could also explain why the Panthers are saving a bit more cap room than other teams. 

crystal ball love GIF by HERSHEY’S Cookies ’n’ Creme

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Me too. If I were the Panthers, I would ask for #2 and #12 this year.  Reading tea leaves:  That could be why they brought in Joey Porter Jr. for a visit.   Can you imagine getting Stroud and a stud CB?  It could also explain why the Panthers are saving a bit more cap room than other teams. 

crystal ball love GIF by HERSHEY’S Cookies ’n’ Creme

JSN visiting would make sense too. Stroud with his WR in the first would be awesome, but unlikely it happens.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

JSN visiting would make sense too. Stroud with his WR in the first would be awesome, but unlikely it happens.

I don't think Houston and Coach Ryans is going to trade up for a QB right now that they can't protect.  They have too many needs.  It does make sense, however, for them to trade back, collect a few extra picks, and go hard after a QB next year--the pickings will be better next year than this year.

I predict that they trade with someone like the Colts and get Anderson at #4 and maybe get a first in 2024 and pick 35 this year--there, they could land a WR--and they would have 2 firsts to get the QB they want in 2024.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I don't think Houston and Coach Ryans is going to trade up for a QB right now that they can't protect.  They have too many needs.  It does make sense, however, for them to trade back, collect a few extra picks, and go hard after a QB next year--the pickings will be better next year than this year.

I predict that they trade with someone like the Colts and get Anderson at #4 and maybe get a first in 2024 and pick 35 this year--there, they could land a WR--and they would have 2 firsts to get the QB they want in 2024.

I tend to agree. Ryans will either pick Stroud or just build up his roster this year with his picks. Do they already have 2 firsts next year because of the Watson trade? If so they could have 3 firsts next year if they do what you are saying. The only thing is the top pick might not be for sale next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...