Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

But Bryce Young did good on a test...right??


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Castavar said:

People need to slow their roll judging Justin Fields too early. Lamar Jackson looked like absolute trash his rookie year. Eagles fans were ready to move on from Jalen Hurts just a year ago. So Justin Fields' S2 could very well be proven right if he goes out there and balls out this year.

what about year 2 Lamar? Eagles were not ready to move on from Hurts.. haha... he had 26 TDs in his sophmore season and the eagles traded away their picks because they were confident in him. 

Im not against you defending Fields, but dont use false story lines to support it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

I'm more- its great we finally have a highly drafted rookie qb to build around then a stupid ass shitty retread

and either one can be a stud with this coaching staff and OL. i really don' think we can go wrong with either one. crap, i think we could even make it work with AR....but i feel much better about either CJ or BY.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

that doesnt make any sense though.... 2020 Burrow had higher.  You can't use the word "ever" and say in X period of time....  just admit the tweet was wrong.. why defend it so hard?

ev·er

at all times; always.

https://bearswire.usatoday.com/2021/05/03/bears-nfl-draft-justin-fields-highest-aptitude-test-score/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

I am a long time Haener stan but gotta be honest--his arm leaves a bit to be desired strength wise.  If Levis/AR are 95+, Bryce/CJ 90+, he's more like an 85.  I'd classify him well higher than a Cassel/Pennington.  He's just not a Round 1 level arm talent, then mix in a frame concern similar to Bryce. 

Really has everything else IMO.  His game is awesome, has a sense of layering throws, pocket work, pre-snap reads, crunch time work, & accuracy down more than most R1 level guys.  

There you are!  I was waiting for you to give us the scoop about your boy Haener.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...