Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer, Morgan, and the Brass having pressers tomorrow?


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Richardson in regards to Allen. Hurts was pretty far along as a passer and honestly not that raw in college.

Even with the Allen Comparisons.. Allen played more college football had more tape and experience then Richardson..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Allen looked pretty damn raw as a passer. More film while still looking equally raw is probably a bad thing IMO. 

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/josh-allen-7.html
 

He had a bad last year but his 2nd season is what ppl were looking at.. 

3,800 total yards and 35Tds with 15ints was a strong season.. Richardson doesn’t have that plus 27 games of playing time compared to 13 is big difference in experience..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't think they've told anybody because I don't think the pick is made yet. They've repeated multiple times that it isn't.

"Leaning" maybe, but nothing definitive.

To be fair, what do they gain by saying anything is definitive.   All you do is lose leverage and honestly they dont owe anything to us as fans and it could just potentially hurt things and help nothing.  He said he hasnt had a full conversation with Frank yet but it was pretty clear which way he was leaning.  People can keep arguing semantics that maybe theyre only 90% sure which way theyre leaning because obviously there are 9 days to go and technically anything could change, but he made it pretty clear they are strongly leaning a direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/josh-allen-7.html
 

He had a bad last year but his 2nd season is what ppl were looking at.. 

3,800 total yards and 35Tds with 15ints was a strong season.. Richardson doesn’t have that plus 27 games of playing time compared to 13 is big difference in experience..

As a passer I only see 28 TDs and 15 INTs with 56% completions against some pretty bad competition in 2016 and then he regressed even worse his final year...  I know he probably wasn't working with much either.

Personally I'd prefer the one with fewer games that showed some raw potential than the one with more who regressed and still looks raw.  I get there is more too look at, but what you are looking at isn't very polished yet.

-This is probably better served on another thread though.  AR isn't our furture QB, Bryce Young is and I'm excited to see how he can elevate our offense!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

As a passer I only see 28 TDs and 15 INTs with 56% completions against some pretty bad competition in 2016 and then he regressed even worse his final year...  I know he probably wasn't working with much either.

Personally I'd prefer the one with fewer games that showed some raw potential than the one with more who regressed and still looks raw.  I get there is more too look at, but what you are looking at isn't very polished yet.

-This is probably better served on another thread though.  AR isn't our furture QB, Bryce Young is and I'm excited to see how he can elevate our offense!

Agree to disagree.. I want more tape (good or bad) more situation played in more experience if I’m taking a raw prospect.. And what nobody wants to talk about is why such a Uber talent took 3 years to get on the field..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...