Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tom Pelissero compares quarterbacks

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

PantherKyle Mentor

PantherKyle

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, t96 said:

We take Bryce, Stroud goes to Indy at 4, AR to Seahawks at 5 and then I think the Pats are gonna trade up with the Raiders by giving away Mac Jones + more and then take Levis at 7.

Doesn't really make sense for the Raiders. Signed Jimmy G, no reason to have Mac as a backup. Drafting a rookie to sit behind Jimmy makes more sense if they want to add a QB. I could see LV actually moving up or sitting pat for a QB. 

As far as Hooker, I wouldn't take him in round one. Offensive system seemed very college-flukey and he is going to be 26 in the fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, PantherKyle said:

Doesn't really make sense for the Raiders. Signed Jimmy G, no reason to have Mac as a backup. Drafting a rookie to sit behind Jimmy makes more sense if they want to add a QB. I could see LV actually moving up or sitting pat for a QB. 

As far as Hooker, I wouldn't take him in round one. Offensive system seemed very college-flukey and he is going to be 26 in the fall.

Mac is a guy McDaniels has already had success with and he could use a bit of a reset and some further development sitting behind Jimmy G for a year or 2 and a good insurance option for when (not if) Jimmy G gets hurt. He's not much older than Levis and is younger than Hooker. Plus there have already been reports that the Raiders could be interested in Mac. They'd get draft picks too. 

 

Just a prediction, probably won't happen but it wouldn't surprise me at all.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherKyle Mentor

PantherKyle

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, t96 said:

Mac is a guy McDaniels has already had success with and he could use a bit of a reset and some further development sitting behind Jimmy G for a year or 2 and a good insurance option for when (not if) Jimmy G gets hurt. He's not much older than Levis and is younger than Hooker. Plus there have already been reports that the Raiders could be interested in Mac. They'd get draft picks too. 

 

Just a prediction, probably won't happen but it wouldn't surprise me at all.

All fair points. I'll come back and pie for sure if it hits!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherOnTheProwl1523 Mentor

PantherOnTheProwl1523

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, t96 said:

We take Bryce, Stroud goes to Indy at 4, AR to Seahawks at 5 and then I think the Pats are gonna trade up with the Raiders by giving away Mac Jones + more and then take Levis at 7.

I posted this in another thread. The Patriots seem to always see what they like and go for that particular player.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/04/20/sports/patriots-had-kentucky-quarterback-will-levis-predraft-visit-whats-up-with-that/?et_rid=1325586788&s_campaign=

Edited by PantherOnTheProwl1523
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • strato
      A look at the team after the draft and udfa signings...

      By strato · Posted

      It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...