Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mock Draft


razorwolf
 Share

Recommended Posts

(1)  Bryce Young, QB  (Alabama)

(39)  Will McDonald IV, Edge  (Iowa St.)

(93)  Darius Rush, CB  (S. Carolina)

(114)  Jonathan Mingo, WR  (OMiss)

(132)  Chandler Zavala, OG  (NC St.)

(145)  Zack Kuntz, TE  (Old Dominion) 

                               or

           Nick Hampton, Edge/LB  (App St.)

* All this is based off NFLDRAFTBUZZ, Players Tape, and other studies including NFL Draft sites used to research prospects*

* Then a lot of the 30 personal visits would be good               ***UDFA***

(65 active on roster, 6 draft picks, and then 19 FA/UDFA) to fill the 90 man roster

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

All I want with pick #39 is the best TE or WR on the board. Get Young someone he can "grow" with for the longterm.

 

 

TEs historically take a long time to develop. If Addison fell to 39 I d take him but this isn’t a very strong WR draft just to take one for the sake of it 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, razorwolf said:

(1)  Bryce Young, QB  (Alabama)

(39)  Will McDonald IV, Edge  (Iowa St.)

(93)  Darius Rush, CB  (S. Carolina)

(114)  Jonathan Mingo, WR  (OMiss)

(132)  Chandler Zavala, OG  (NC St.)

(145)  Zack Kuntz, TE  (Old Dominion) 

                               or

           Nick Hampton, Edge/LB  (App St.)

* All this is based off NFLDRAFTBUZZ, Players Tape, and other studies including NFL Draft sites used to research prospects*

* Then a lot of the 30 personal visits would be good               ***UDFA***

(65 active on roster, 6 draft picks, and then 19 FA/UDFA) to fill the 90 man roster

Would love this draft 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...