Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Final Say..the S2 scores that were leaked aren't accurate


Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

It would be pretty easy info for the top teams in the draft to find out so I don’t really buy other teams leaking he had a bad score. But all reports coming out now is Stroud is gonna slip in the draft there has to be a reason 

As he said in this interview, once the scores came out he had a bunch of GMs call him. 
 

Every year a guy starts to slip and more often than not it turns out he shouldn’t have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Varking said:

He said that player was at an all star game. That wasn’t CJ. Reaching. 

They can't hear/see anything beyond his cute little face. HE could be the low score, their heads would explode because it's all they've got...

He's smart enough to conquer football without the physical side. Silly.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Evil Hurney said:

I don't understand this part. I thought all the teams had access to the scores. Why would they care if the "wrong" scores got out?

I think only about half the teams in the NFL pay for access to the S2 test. It is this guy’s worst nightmare for his test to tank the stock of a top prospect before he has full buy in from every team. Once he has full buy in, no college QB would dare decline the test. But until he has that, he doesn’t want the college QBs to start seeing reasons not to take it. He is an extremely biased source giving extremely vague information.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mwright350 said:

These scores are such an odd thing to fixate on.  

Agreed, I am so tired of hearing about them. Obviously Stroud's score hurt him which is a shame as his game tape tells another story and his arm delivers a very nice accurate pass which is something all QB's should be able to do in order to be taken seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Evil Hurney said:

The "context" story is most likely about Hendon Hooker (possibly Clayton Tune). To my knowledge CJ Stroud (as well as B. Young, W. Levis, A. Richardson) didn't take part in an All-Star game this season.

As far as the 2nd guy? I didn't get enough clues, but probability would suggest Stroud as he would be the biggest outlier on the leaked list ... possibly AR. I doubt any of the 90's scores are the incorrect ones since he made a point to talk about context and re-testing.

The leaked list I assume is being used: 

 

 

I think the other score he is talking about might be Anthony Richardson’s. There had been reports of him scoring in the high 80’s-low 90’s previously. The silence from Stroud’s camp on this is deafening.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

We are picking Young.  And when that pick comes in, please start a thread about the new team you are going to root for, because I doubt people want to deal with you every time our QB gets hit or has a turnover over the next decade.  Your obsession with name-calling and Young bashing is borderline.  Perhaps we will understand more when Netflix completes their documentary on you.

 

A vertically challenged individual must have banged his significant other. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...