Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A quick reminder for those of you who believe in after draft “Grades”


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is a good reminder to some of you you who like listening to the talking heads who give draft grades right after a player is selected, where they get extremely emotional and are screaming opinions like it is the gospel. I can already see multiple threads around the horizon from trolls who will disagree with a pick, and will go straight to “after draft grade” as evidence showing why they are right. Here is a good example of a draft Fitty had a heavy hand in: 

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTRTcNhSo/

IMG_8856.jpeg

IMG_8858.jpeg

Edited by WarPanthers89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think draft grades are highly subjective and pretty much all of them should be TBD.  It’s all speculation followed by selective memory of “ I told you this guy was going to be good” while not remembering the 20 other guys you wanted that busted out. 

I enjoy reading draft grades but mostly for entertainment value. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I think draft grades are highly subjective and pretty much all of them should be TBD.  It’s all speculation followed by selective memory of “ I told you this guy was going to be good” while not remembering the 20 other guys you wanted that busted out. 

I enjoy reading draft grades but mostly for entertainment value. 

The post season re-drafts are always funny. Maybe like 2 picks in the top 15 stick as the right option, and even then it's just assuming the failure/success would be equal with each teams coaching staff and playing schedule. Chinn is a good example of should have gone higher, then looked mediocre out of position, to now looking like how does he even fit in a 3-4

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, shaqattaq said:

2019 D+. Without Burns...a complete shitshow and a waste of a draft.

Little, Grier, whatever the name of that defensive back was that didn't do sh-t... Yikes 😬

Fairly safe to say nobody's missing Marty right now.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...