Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers Draft Grade


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, SOJA said:

is this speculation or do you have actual info on this 

 

13 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

Knee problems and foot problems red flagged him for most teams. 

Rayzor or Rodeo also said they were told his visit here was bad enough that the Panthers ruled him out.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No doubt you don't know until they play...but from this vantage point, I give it a solid B+

I mean, we landed a franchise QB.  

We took our fave WR available over the EDGE, CB, OL, & TE talent at 39.  That's fine, especially considering only the top-4 WRs were off the board.  Mingo has a ton of upside, took WR5.  Boldin/AJ Brown type traits.  Add another receiver with strong hands and a big wingspan for Young. 

However, we took the WR at a risk value wise, and instead of seeing a subsequent run on WRs like Downs/Hyatt/etc., the run was on EDGE & DBs.

The DJ Johnson pick seems like the elephant in the room.  We clearly coveted getting an EDGE once we took Mingo but then many went.  Wanted someone with upside for Evero more than looking elsewhere position-wise.  And that's who they had over Adebawore, McGuire, Feheko, etc.  Once Byron Young went, we made the move as it seems DJ was one of the last EDGE targets we had an eye on R3 and higher.  

Zavala & Robinson were both great value and strong talent that will have a chance to make an impact.  

I don't like not capitalizing on the DB, TE and RB talent in this draft but we had limited picks.  Mortgaged one, but no future picks.  Still have 6 next year w/out our 1st.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other than Bryce….

I liked the Mingo pick. Getting a big WR to pair and grow with your rookie QB was a good move. There were better players on the board but with Thielen and Chark not likely here very long it was the right move. B+

DJ Johnson pick was terrible. Traded up to get a 25 year old rookie with scant college production because he had a good combine. F-

Zavala was a decent pick. OL depth was needed and he might start early due to the Corbett injury. B-

Robinson was a head scratcher. Safety wasn’t a need and they really needed corner depth in this draft. C-

I’m glad they swung for the fences with the QB but taking that out of the picture I give this draft a C+. There’s potential to hit on a few of these guys but I think there is a solid chance we do not see any of these players get a second contract. 

Edited by hepcat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2023 at 8:43 AM, Bear Hands said:

However, we took the WR at a risk value wise, and instead of seeing a subsequent run on WRs like Downs/Hyatt/etc., the run was on EDGE & DBs.

This is a great point, I think there was a miscalculation.  We could have had a better Edge in Round 2 and only a slight downgrade at WR in round 3 at 93 or trade up to 80 to potentially still get Downs (who I think went at 79)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, NAS said:

This is a great point, I think there was a miscalculation.  We could have had a better Edge in Round 2 and only a slight downgrade at WR in round 3 at 93 or trade up to 80 to potentially still get Downs (who I think went at 79)

What I personally would have been a big fan was taking Brents, Ojulari, heck even DJ Turner or Tuli at 39. It didn't seem like we had any trade partners so had to choose, and Mingo was clearly in a tier of his own for us WR wise.  I think that's worthy of the pick, especially if they felt he's such a good fit (which is apparent), but it was a calculated risk. 

Given we haven't seen the results, can't say full it's a full miscalculation, but I think it was in regards of pure value received.    

If we went EDGE or DB, the board would have shifted a bit from what went down--then we come back with the aggressive trade-up for Mims/Hyatt/Tillman/Downs in the 3rd (or just wait for a Charlie Jones or Tyler Scott type)

It was clear: We wanted 2 types-- a future X Receiver and an EDGE to compliment Burns.  And that we were ALL about Mingo.  It seems those wants superseded BPA this draft.  So they're throwing a lot of trust at Mingo and DJJ to work out.  We'll see if it pays off.  

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ehh, new front office has 2 drafts under their belt -- Salaun draft class was really a horrible class in general, but Salaun has started to show some of his potential and KJ Simpson not bad for a 2nd round pick. This past draft clearly looks like it was knocked out of the fuging park obviously with Kon but also Sion and Kalk already contributing in somewhat big roles for late round picks. And McNeeley has shown potential and lit it up in summer league, seems to be doing well in the G league for a young guy too.      As for this season I think a very realistic goal and outcome of the regular season is sneaking up into a 7 or 8 seed and then winning 1 of 2 play-in games to make the real playoffs. Probably get cooked in round 1 but that playoff experience and establishing that expectation of winning is critical to the development of our young core. 
    • Sound write-up MHS, as always.  Agree that the smart move that forward thinking franchises make would be drafting a tackle early, if not for sure in R1, depending on who's there. Based on early predictions we're choosing between Fano and Proctor. No brainer here...Fano all day. Proctor does not move the needle for me. In my mind, Icky has less future here than Brooks does. I love Icky, but he has been average as a top-10 pick, one good year where you saw the potential...and that was this year. He's built like a RT and his strengths are there, but he's always played left. I also feel like part of what has held him back from being elite, was his work ethic. He was known for it coming out, but feel like he fell right at home in Carolina and maybe didn't push himself as hard as he needed to. Throw in a major crucial injury that will take time to recover and a historical low return rate to current form, and the outlook is not great. Fano can play both sides and we need to also plan for Moton's departure. Either way, delaying drafting a tackle early this year will hurt us down the line. Our current OL is overpriced and needs to start adding draftees to start balancing out the inevitable changes coming in the next 2-3 years.  As others have said, maybe Icky can replace Hunt or Lewis in a couple years when he's fully recovered....IDK. Also not a guarantee, but then you have to figure out his contract and it becomes even more clouded.
    • It's past time to just eliminate it in terms of an event. Just do the voting, name the roster, and move on. When you get down to 6th and 7th alternates it's just absurd. It doesn't mean anything.
×
×
  • Create New...