Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ranking the NFCS Rosters

poundaway

By poundaway,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted

Good to hear the Panthers getting some love. It's nice to have Ryan Brees and now Brady out of the picture. If anyone thinks this might be an easy division though I would wait and see what the preseason brings. The Bucs could go either way but the Saints and Falcons will definitely test us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

He’s played 0 snaps in the nfl.  I’m going to hold off on proclaiming what he is until he actually does it.   And where did I call him incompetent?

You said we need a competent QB. Then you doubled down with Dalton. Young is a competent QB. He meets all of the criteria of the statement. He has everything needed to have success himself. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Smithers said:

I don’t agree.  Tampa’s O-line is trash.  They lost their top RB.  Their pass rush is below average.  And they have the worst QB in the division.

Mmmm but they still have the big pieces, and they have depth(at least of last year). I won’t start catching up on other teams rosters until 53 is set in August/September, too many variables to worry about out of the house stuff. What I know is our depth the past 3 years has been complete garbage and last year was no exception. Wilks was just about to coax a little more out of them and didn’t have as many injuries. As a complete roster going into the season from last season I’d go,

TB

NO =/> CAR

 ATL. 

Depth matters.

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

You said we need a competent QB. Then you doubled down with Dalton. Young is a competent QB. He meets all of the criteria of the statement. He has everything needed to have success himself. 

He is not a qb competent yet.   He hasn’t taken one fuging snap yet.  He is totally unproven.  Goddamn some of you guys need to not get so fuging emotional defending him.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

He is not a qb competent yet.   He hasn’t taken one fuging snap yet.  He is totally unproven.  Goddamn some of you guys need to not get so fuging emotional defending him.   

Like I said. You are confusing competent and unproven. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted

I don’t understand why people think our roster is worse than Tampa and Atlanta’s outside if the QB? We split with these teams last year with terrible QB play and half of a coaching staff. I think we definitely got better as well. Brown, Burns, Horn, Chinn, and Shaq are as good of pieces as any defense in the division. Our OL is probably the best, Sanders is probably better than Tampa or NO’s RBs (with Kamara suspended), our WRs are pretty unproven outside of Thielen/Chark so we are probably last there but Hurst is mid-tier for TE (below ATL obviously). 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sean Payton's Vicodin Grand Master

Sean Payton's Vicodin

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I don’t understand why people think our roster is worse than Tampa and Atlanta’s outside if the QB? We split with these teams last year with terrible QB play and half of a coaching staff. I think we definitely got better as well. Brown, Burns, Horn, Chinn, and Shaq are as good of pieces as any defense in the division. Our OL is probably the best, Sanders is probably better than Tampa or NO’s RBs (with Kamara suspended), our WRs are pretty unproven outside of Thielen/Chark so we are probably last there but Hurst is mid-tier for TE (below ATL obviously). 

I think Atlantas roster is heavily underrated. If their QB is halfway decent (big ask), they won't compete with the 49ers or Eagles but they will be in that 2nd tier of NFC teams with the Giants, Seahawks etc.

Tampa and NO rosters are old and bad.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I don’t understand why people think our roster is worse than Tampa and Atlanta’s outside if the QB? We split with these teams last year with terrible QB play and half of a coaching staff. I think we definitely got better as well. Brown, Burns, Horn, Chinn, and Shaq are as good of pieces as any defense in the division. Our OL is probably the best, Sanders is probably better than Tampa or NO’s RBs (with Kamara suspended), our WRs are pretty unproven outside of Thielen/Chark so we are probably last there but Hurst is mid-tier for TE (below ATL obviously). 

 

I truly believe that most folks just can't let go of the past. Their fear of the past is stronger than their hope for the future.

 

Also, there are those that just have to be realists. But that's a whole different animal. lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PleaseCutStewart Grand Master

PleaseCutStewart

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Mmmm but they still have the big pieces, and they have depth(at least of last year). I won’t start catching up on other teams rosters until 53 is set in August/September, too many variables to worry about out of the house stuff. What I know is our depth the past 3 years has been complete garbage and last year was no exception. Wilks was just about to coax a little more out of them and didn’t have as many injuries. As a complete roster going into the season from last season I’d go,

TB

NO =/> CAR

 ATL. 

Depth matters.

I think NO has the most complete team/depth outside of QB, and they actually got a solid QB this year.

Not sure how you have Tampa ranked #1 - the team lost their entire pass rush outside of Vea, is awful at half of their O-line spots (with no oline depth), and practially lost all of their secondary depth

The only positions I think they are strong at is WR (if Godwin can actually stay healthy), LB, and secondary (1 injury here severely changes that though). 

I wouldn't be surprised if Tampa is a seller at the trade deadline and finishes last in the division.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Who is underrating Atlanta's roster?

 

They have been getting praise all offseason for their moves and draft. Their only weakness is QB. They literally have the skill positions on offense. They improved that defense tremendously.

The article linked at the beginning of the thread. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

I think Atlantas roster is heavily underrated. If their QB is halfway decent (big ask), they won't compete with the 49ers or Eagles but they will be in that 2nd tier of NFC teams with the Giants, Seahawks etc.

Tampa and NO rosters are old and bad.

Atlanta has some great skill players, but how are they in the trenches? The OL and run defense was pretty bad last year. They do have the 2nd best coaching staff IMO outside of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...