Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corral deserves a fair shot


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

lol

 

First I was a Corall lover, now I'm a Bryce hater. Dalton is the only one left. How do I feel about him? 

 

I know this is tough on you, but it is possible to want what is best for the team. And still support @Jmac and his thread about Corall having his rookie season sabotaged by Rhule, and then being ended by a freak injury. 

 

It is possible to want Corall to get a shot to prove what he has, and still be excited about what Bryce can bring. 

 

Some of you defend Bryce like he is made of glass. He isn't? Is he?

I support Corral. I just think it will be for another team.

 

How did we go from we were trying to trade him to now he might be a threat to  Bryce Young?

 

lol you guys are funny I must admit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I thought that's why we signed Andy Dalton?

 

I don't see any Andy Dalton topics. Corall already made a cryptic post about his future anyway. I honestly don't see a long term future with Corral in Carolina.

 

 

Dalton will not be here forever.  My hopes is that Corral can develop into a good #2.  Will not be this year, but maybe in a couple of years.  Got to try to set up for the future as well.  Corral is on a cheap rookie deal so as long as he shows some potential is a good investment.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I support Corral. I just think it will be for another team.

 

How did we go from we were trying to trade him to now he might be a threat to  Bryce Young?

 

lol you guys are funny I must admit. 

 

Not sure why you quoted me for this?

 

I never suggested he could replace Bryce. 

 

Man, you sure are willing to say anything aint'cha? And you want to call other folks funny? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Dalton will not be here forever.  My hopes is that Corral can develop into a good #2.  Will not be this year, but maybe in a couple of years.  Got to try to set up for the future as well.  Corral is on a cheap rookie deal so as long as he shows some potential is a good investment.

 

Exactly. Not sure why this seems to bother so many ppl? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Dalton will not be here forever.  My hopes is that Corral can develop into a good #2.  Will not be this year, but maybe in a couple of years.  Got to try to set up for the future as well.  Corral is on a cheap rookie deal so as long as he shows some potential is a good investment.

Corral had a cryptic post earlier this offseason. He doesn't seem like the type who wants to sit behind a QB younger than him just to be a backup.

 

I think he would welcome a new opportunity on another team where he has a legit chance to compete for a job.

 

If he wants to stay in Carolina then by all means keep him. Im just saying I don't think he's talented enough to beat out Bryce or Dalton.

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

Not sure why you quoted me for this?

 

I never suggested he could replace Bryce. 

 

Man, you sure are willing to say anything aint'cha? And you want to call other folks funny? 

Oh I get it now. You just have a problem with the "Brycers"...

 

But the thread is about Corral...

 

But-you-lost-me GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ladypanther said:

Looks like that has not yet been voted on...league meeting in a couple of days.  Here is a link to an article of the things under consideration including:

To allow a club to designate an emergency third quarterback from its inactive list or practice squad who would be eligible to enter a game in the event the first two quarterbacks on the game day active list are ruled “Out.” (Proposal by Detroit Lions; amends Article XVII, Section 17.3.)

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/proposed-nfl-rule-changes-2023/

It didn’t have the votes yet so they pulled it from this years rule change possibilities 

https://www.mlive.com/lions/2023/03/nfl-owners-adopt-several-rule-changes-table-emergency-qb-proposal-from-lions.html?outputType=amp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Oh I get it now. You just have a problem with the "Brycers"...

 

But the thread is about Corral...

 

But-you-lost-me GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY

 

Dude, go back to gifs and memes, cuz the written word seems to perplex you something fierce. In other words, stay in your lane.

 

Bye Bye

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I believe in Bryce. 

 

Corral god bless him but he's not the answer imo.

So what happens if MC goes to TC and makes BY look 2nd string? Should BY still start or is it about what's best for the team? Most of us don't care who starts as long as it's what's best for the team. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Dalton will not be here forever.  My hopes is that Corral can develop into a good #2.  Will not be this year, but maybe in a couple of years.  Got to try to set up for the future as well.  Corral is on a cheap rookie deal so as long as he shows some potential is a good investment.

Exactly. 

The goal for Corral should be the same as it should have been last year: he starts the season as #3 on the depth chart and hopefully can work himself up to #2 because the current #2 (assuming that is Dalton) is not going to be here forever.  Corral is on a rookie deal, take advantage of it.

If it works, you might have a decent #2 which is rather important.  Not top 15 starter level, but good enough.  If it doesn't, you are in the same shape you are in if you get rid of him now.

Add the fact that his first year here was a waste to the long list of things The Process screwed up.  Of course, Rhule couldn't have done that last year because that would have put Corral in competition with "OOU" for the #3 slot and besides, he was a red shirt freshman.

I'm not sure why all the angst over that.  Nobody is saying Corral is going to be the starter, unless the two QBs in front of him go down with injury.  That never happens, just ask the 49ers.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Exactly. 

The goal for Corral should be the same as it should have been last year: he starts the season as #3 on the depth chart and hopefully can work himself up to #2 because the current #2 (assuming that is Dalton) is not going to be here forever.  Corral is on a rookie deal, take advantage of it.

If it works, you might have a decent #2 which is rather important.  Not top 15 starter level, but good enough.  If it doesn't, you are in the same shape you are in if you get rid of him now.

Add the fact that his first year here was a waste to the long list of things The Process screwed up.  Of course, Rhule couldn't have done that last year because that would have put Corral in competition with "OOU" for the #3 slot and besides, he was a red shirt freshman.

I'm not sure why all the angst over that.  Nobody is saying Corral is going to be the starter, unless the two QBs in front of him go down with injury.  That never happens, just ask the 49ers.

 

Yuppers. Way too many folks equate rooting for Corall to mean that they want him over Bryce. That inferiority complex is going to be fun to watch. 

 

How are these folks going to handle the whole NFL world making fun of Bryce? We are going to need a whole lot of xanax for some of these folks.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, poster also said Young or Mahomes, it would have made no difference.  If there was way to actually test that hypothetical, I would sell every belonging I have and wager that Mahomes would indeed yield different results.  Mahomes automatically changes the D coverages.  He automatically changes the threats.  He attacks and threatens a field different vastly different.   We have seen good QBs and great QBs play behind horrific OLs in a single season....and they don't default into being the worst team in the NFL.  Frank Reich was old, stubborn and not creative enough to deal with an anomaly QB like Bryce.  The best QB in the NFL wouldn't be handicapping Frank, they would be enhancing Frank.  Starting week 1, Frank didn't even trust Bryce with basics....Frank gave him I what I feel comfortable with you being able to do offense.  Which took throws and plays off the table because Bryce couldn't do early on what a bad vet in Dalton could.  Mahomes would not yield the same results. 
    • All I have to say to this really, is it sounds nice and downgrades Stroud to make Young look better is more like what this take does. Look at the WR numbers the year before and then the year with Stroud. He made them better, not the other way around. That’s my opinion. I appreciate you designating that it was yours. Many state these things as facts.
    • but what if.....and here me out....the pro Bryce Young stuff was coming from people under Fitterer.  You know, the people who are employed to feed him that input.  And they happen to all still be employed here.  when Rhule was fired I desperately wanted Fitterer fired.  It set things up for Fitterer to be the sacrificial lamb the next time things went poorly....every time we move on from a disaster, we are retaining a heavy % of the folks who helped bring the disaster we are "moving on from".  Everyone argued Fitterer probably could be great and it was all Rhule.  We are just repeating the same stuff to a degree IMO.   Panthers needed a clean slate post Rhule era.  Needed another post Frank era.  Things were just too bad or too dysfunctional IMO to be salvaging so much.   We keep failing to do that. 
×
×
  • Create New...