Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers-Charlotte current stadium agreement ends.


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

So in other words Charlotte is not the biggest city on the East Coast...

 

Im convinced most of you guys don't travel. It's amazing how many people think Charlotte is a big city. Charlotte is basically a mini Atlanta. 

So you're saying Charlotte is not the biggest city on the East Coast? Shame on my geography teacher for telling me otherwise!

I Hate It Reaction GIF by Laff

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Meh, not really.  The NFL wouldn't suffer much if the Panthers left.

you say this but the data tells a different story... year over year Panthers are worth more to the NFL than the following teams when its comes to total revenue:

 

  • Detroit Lions - $452 million ($114 million)
  • Cincinnati Bengals - $462 million ($89 million)
  • Arizona Cardinals - $467 million ($112 million)
  • Buffalo Bills -  $470 million ($83 million)
  • Jacksonville Jaguars -  $471 million ($114 million)
  • Tennessee Titans - $481 million ($115 million)
  • Indianapolis Colts - $484 million ($100 million)
  • New Orleans Saints - $490 million ($125 million)
  • Los Angeles Chargers - $491 million ($156 million)
  • Tampa Bay Buccaneers - $492 million ($62 million)
  • Pittsburgh Steelers - $494 million ($135 million)
  • Kansas City Chiefs - $495 million ($135 million)
  • Minnesota Vikings - $500 million ($141 million)
  • Carolina Panthers - $501 million ($139 million)

What this tells us is that the Charlotte market is a very healthy Market for the NFL. They would not want to risk any transition revenue. When the Chargers and Rams moved from their original locations the NFL lost money. NFL isnt in the business to lose money.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

So in other words Charlotte is not the biggest city on the East Coast...

 

Im convinced most of you guys don't travel. It's amazing how many people think Charlotte is a big city. Charlotte is basically a mini Atlanta. 

uhh dude you know that Charlotte almost has twice the population than Atlanta, right?  Also, Charlotte is almost 3x the size of Atlanta geography wise....  

Charlotte 308 sq miles
Atlanta 134 sq miles

Really odd you chose to argue this one. There is no data that can support your claim here....

image.png

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

uhh dude you know that Charlotte almost has twice the population than Atlanta, right?  Also, Charlotte is almost 3x the size of Atlanta geography wise....  

Charlotte 308 sq miles
Atlanta 134 sq miles

Really odd you chose to argue this one. There is no data that can support your claim here....

image.png

facts GIF

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

uhh dude you know that Charlotte almost has twice the population than Atlanta, right?  Also, Charlotte is almost 3x the size of Atlanta geography wise....  

Charlotte 308 sq miles
Atlanta 134 sq miles

Really odd you chose to argue this one. There is no data that can support your claim here....

image.png

Sorry but this is a bad take. Look at the MSA population. Have you even been to Atlanta? No way anyone whose been there could say “Charlotte is bigger”

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

facts GIF

 

39 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

uhh dude you know that Charlotte almost has twice the population than Atlanta, right?  Also, Charlotte is almost 3x the size of Atlanta geography wise....  

Charlotte 308 sq miles
Atlanta 134 sq miles

Really odd you chose to argue this one. There is no data that can support your claim here....

image.png

Hmmm!!! According to that chart Charlotte is bigger than Atlanta and we all know it's a better place to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

There isn't enough talent for 40 teams, hell it's diluted enough as is. 

 

That was my first thought as well. Although the talent has increased here lately. It still is no where near deep enough for 40 teams. And that isn't even factoring in the QB position. Just ain't gon happen cappen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

uhh dude you know that Charlotte almost has twice the population than Atlanta, right?  Also, Charlotte is almost 3x the size of Atlanta geography wise....  

Charlotte 308 sq miles
Atlanta 134 sq miles

Really odd you chose to argue this one. There is no data that can support your claim here....

image.png

ATL is on Par with Raleigh for population, and only a little above Fayetteville, Charlotte dwarfs ATL It was a terrible argument, maybe educate yourself before spewing nonsense @CamWhoaaCam

Hai Guys Charlotte is over 2x the size of ATL with 2x the population but its just a mini ATL. Lol. 

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, neverlosethefeeling said:

Sorry but this is a bad take. Look at the MSA population. Have you even been to Atlanta? No way anyone whose been there could say “Charlotte is bigger”

What you are using is subjective context, not actual population based metrics. Why on earth would it matter how someone feels about a city's size.... when the market itself to the NFL has nothing to do with the metro....

The SF 49ers' stadium is 1 hour from the SF metro... Chicago's new stadium is going to be almost an hour from the metro. 

Looking at MSA population is nothing but a distraction to the actual data on population and total dollar value of a city...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

What you are using is subjective context, not actual population based metrics. Why on earth would it matter how someone feels about a city's size.... when the market itself to the NFL has nothing to do with the metro....

The SF 49ers' stadium is 1 hour from the SF metro... Chicago's new stadium is going to be almost an hour from the metro. 

Looking at MSA population is nothing but a distraction to the actual data on population and total dollar value of a city...

Didnt you know those people outside the metro area arent allowed to commute?

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...