Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor - Canes Adding Tarasenko


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, backINblack28 said:

yeah it looks like his old agent had a deal in place with us and then he fired them. back to square one, and considering that, i'd think that does not help our chances. course Orlov and he are best buds..

Agent may have thought he had a deal but Tarasenko didn’t see it that way for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, DavidEng said:

The Tarasenko Twitter Show just keeps getting better. This from a NY Post writer (covers the Rangers).

 

I read he could do a 1 year with the rags then revisit next year when the cap is suppose to go up by 4M. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

If we dont get Tarasenko, we better keep looking for someone else.

As long as it’s a scoring forward. Not a lot of big offensive line scorers in this offseason. And I don’t want to go try to get more scoring on defense that’s not our weakness.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Harbingers said:

I read he could do a 1 year with the rags then revisit next year when the cap is suppose to go up by 4M. 

Then does this, tears his ACL, and has to sign a 3 year 8 mill contract.

If he does this, it's definitely a ballsy move for a guy with a litany of injuries in his career

Edited by PleaseCutStewart
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DavidEng said:

Who knows if this is real. Sportswriter supposedly but few followers. I think it bs but who knows.

 

 

1 hour ago, DavidEng said:

Who knows if this is real. Sportswriter supposedly but few followers. I think it bs but who knows.

 

Obviously fake news Would have been out all over the place by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...